Practical Logic and Future Trends of Artificial Intelligence Empowering Environmental Design Education

  • Wenliang Ye Chodang University
Article ID: 4641
12 Views
Keywords: Artificial Intelligence; Environmental Design; Educational Restructuring; Human-Machine Collaboration; Educational Ethics

Abstract

With the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence technologies in areas such as image generation, spatial simulation, and behavior recognition, environmental design education is undergoing a profound paradigm shift. Based on the context of AI empowerment, this paper systematically analyzes the practical logic and reconstruction pathways of artificial intelligence in environmental design education, covering multiple dimensions including curriculum content, competency structures, course systems, evaluation mechanisms, and educational ethics. The study highlights that while AI enhances teaching efficiency, boosts creative expression, and expands design logic, it also brings challenges related to students’ creative subjectivity, cultural diversity in expression, and fairness in evaluation. As “human-machine collaboration” becomes a new norm in teaching, environmental design education must move beyond tool-dependent thinking and construct an instructional framework that integrates intelligent generation, humanistic judgment, and systemic capabilities. The paper emphasizes the need to transition from “technological embedding” to “value co-construction” in order to achieve sustainable innovation and deep transformation in environmental design education.

Published
2025-06-25
How to Cite
Ye, W. (2025). Practical Logic and Future Trends of Artificial Intelligence Empowering Environmental Design Education. Learning & Education, 14(2). Retrieved from https://ojs.piscomed.com/index.php/L-E/article/view/4641
Issue
Vol. 14 No. 2 (2025)
Section
Article

References

[1] Wang, S., Wang, F., Zhu, Z., Wang, J., Tran, T., & Du, Z. (2024). Artificial intelligence in education: A systematic literature review.

Expert Syst. Appl., 252, 124167.

[2] Tabuenca, B., Uche-Soria, M., Greller, W., Leo, D.H., Balcells-Falgueras, P., Gloor, P.A., & Garbajosa, J. (2023). Greening smart

learning environments with Artificial Intelligence of Things.Internet Things, 25, 101051.

[3] Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Review.IEEE Access, 8, 75264-75278.

[4] Guan, C., Mou, J., & Jiang, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence innovation in education: A twenty-year data-driven historical analysis.

International Journal of Innovation Studies, 4, 134-147.

[5] Xu, W., & Fan, O. (2021). A systematic review of AI role in the educational system based on a proposed conceptual framework. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 4195 - 4223.

[6] Chai, D., Kim, H., Kim, K., Ha, Y., Shin, S., & Yoon, S. (2025). Generative Artificial Intelligence in Instructional System Design.

Human Resource Development Review.

[7] Requejo, W., Martínez, F., Vega, C., Martínez, R., Cendrero, A., & Lantada, D. (2024). Fostering creativity in engineering design

through constructive dialogues with generative artificial intelligence.Cell Reports Physical Science.

[8] Bahroun, Z., Anane, C., Ahmed, V., & Zacca, A. (2023). Transforming Education: A Comprehensive Review of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Educational Settings through Bibliometric and Content Analysis.Sustainability.

[9] Huang, K., Liu, Y., & Dong, M. (2024). Incorporating AIGC into Design Ideation: A Study on Self-Efficacy and Learning Experience Acceptance under Higher-Order Thinking.Thinking Skills and Creativity.

[10] Chiu, T. (2021). A Holistic Approach to the Design of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Education for K-12 Schools.TechTrends, 65, 796

- 807.

[11] Jung, D., & Suh, S. (2024). Enhancing Soft Skills through Generative AI in Sustainable Fashion Textile Design Education. Sustainability.

[12] Huang, K., Liu, Y., Dong, M., & Lu, C. (2024). Integrating AIGC into product design ideation teaching: An empirical study on

self-efficacy and learning outcomes.Learning and Instruction.

[13] Fernández‐Sánchez, A., Lorenzo‐Castiñeiras, J., & Sánchez-Bello, A. (2024). Navigating the Future of Pedagogy: The Integration

of AI Tools in Developing Educational Assessment Rubrics.European Journal of Education.

[14] Dai, Y., Lin, Z., Liu, A., & Wang, W. (2023). An embodied, analogical and disruptive approach of AI pedagogy in upper elementary education: An experimental study.Br. J. Educ. Technol., 55, 417-434.

[15] Yue, M., Jong, M., & Dai, Y. (2022). Pedagogical Design of K-12 Artificial Intelligence Education: A Systematic Review. Sustainability.

[16] Brusilovsky, P. (2023). AI in Education, Learner Control, and Human-AI Collaboration.International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 1-14.

[17] Haupt, M., Freidank, J., & Haas, A. (2024). Consumer responses to human-AI collaboration at organizational frontlines: strategies

to escape algorithm aversion in content creation.Review of Managerial Science.

[18] Vinchon, F., Lubart, T., Bartolotta, S., Gironnay, V., Botella, M., Bourgeois-Bougrine, S., Burkhardt, J., Bonnardel, N., Corazza, G.,

Glăveanu, V., Hanson, M., Ivcevic, Z., Karwowski, M., Kaufman, J., Okada, T., Reiter‐Palmon, R., & Gaggioli, A. (2023). Artificial Intelligence & Creativity: A Manifesto for Collaboration. The Journal of Creative Behavior.

[19] Fu, Y., & Weng, Z. (2024). Navigating the Ethical Terrain of AI in Education: A Systematic Review on Framing Responsible Human-Centered AI Practices.Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence.

[20] Airaj, M. (2024). Ethical artificial intelligence for teaching-learning in higher education. Educ. Inf. Technol., 29, 17145-17167.