Software Quality Management of Small Outsourcing Companies Based on CMMI Model

  • Chuang Chen University of Shanghai for Science and Technology
Article ID: 2396
120 Views, 31 PDF Downloads
Keywords: Outsourcing company, Software quality, CMMI model

Abstract

The development of outsourcing companies is stimulated by the digital trend of the industry and the penetration of digital technology.They are striving to adapt to industry application scenarios,and improving software quality has become the focus of outsourcing companies.This paper takes small outsourcing companies as the research object,adopts the Capability Maturity Model Integration(CMMI)model to conduct a comprehensive design for continuous improvement of the outsourcing company’s business processes,and evaluates software quality maturity capabilities through expert scoring methods,and selects some key areas as indicators to build the model and the maturity ability level is determined.Taking the general business process of the small outsourcing company as a benchmark,comprehensively evaluate its main key domain indicators,and analyze the improved maturity level as IV,which provides a constructive basis for the small outsourcing company to further improve the software quality.

References

[1] Shang Qingchen(2021).The new characteristics and countermeasures of the transformation and upgrading of my country's service outsourcing industry under the new situation[J].Economic Review,(07):94-101.

[2] Permana R,Budiardjo E,Ferdinansyah A(2019).Assessment of Software Engineering Process Based on CMMI-QFD Framework,2019[C].ACM.

[3] Ding Ning(2021).Quality Control Analysis of Software Testing Process[J].Network Security Technology and Application,(05):65-66.

[4] Chen Yang,Miao Tong,Ma Xin(2020).Research on Performance Evaluation of Pension Institutions Based on AHP Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method[J].China Prices,(05):90-93.

Published
2021-11-07
How to Cite
Chen, C. (2021). Software Quality Management of Small Outsourcing Companies Based on CMMI Model. Learning & Education, 10(3), 76-78. https://doi.org/10.18282/l-e.v10i3.2396