A Stereotype or a Fact: Females are Better Second Language Learners
Abstract
There are some general perceptions which say that “girls have a better language aptitude.â€, or “women are better language learners.†Combining considering the women’s dominant position in the field of language education, it is widely known as common knowledge that females are better language speakers and learners. Some pieces of research hold an idea that females are more excelling in their mother tongue (first language/L1) than males[1]. The scientific community then naturally speculated on a hypothesis, which suggests that female are better language learners in the second language(L2). In order to verify the hypothesis, some studies in Twenty century have investigated the gender differences in the second language acquisition[2][3]. However, the outcomes are either dated or that the number of subjects is sparse.References
[1] Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. (1974). The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press
[2] Boyle, J. P. (1987). Sex differences in listening vocabulary. Language Learning, 37(2), 273-284.
[3] Farhady, H. (1982). Measures of language proficiency from the learner’s perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 16(1), 43-59.
[4] Slik, F. W. P. v. d., Hout, R. W. N. M. v., & Schepens, J. J. (2015). The gender gap in second language acquisition: Gender differences in the acquisition of Dutch among immigrants from 88 countries with 49 mother tongues. PLoS One, 10(11), e0142056.
[5] Payne, T. W., & Lynn, R. (2011). Sex differences in second language comprehension. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(3), 434-436.
[6] Andreou, G., Vlachos, F., & Andreou, E. (2005). Affecting factors in second language learning. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 34(5), 429-438.
[7] Wucherer, B. V., & Reiterer, S. M. (2018). Language is a girlie thing, isn’t it? A psycholinguistic exploration of the L2 gender gap. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 21(1), 118-134.
[8] Trofifimova, I. (2013). A study of the dynamics of sex differences in adulthood. International Journal of Psychology, 48(6), 1230–1236.
[9] Gu, Y. (2002). Gender, academic major, and vocabulary learning strategies of Chinese EFL learners. RELC Journal, 33(1), 35-54.
[10] Nhan, N. T. & Lai, H. T. (2013). A Comparison on the Use of Language Learning Strategies by Male and Female Vietnamese TertiaryStudents of Non-English Majors. Language in India, 13(4), 185
[11] Newman, T. (2018) Sex and gender: What is the difference? Medical News Today. Retrieved from https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/232363.php.
[12] Eysenck, H. J., and Eysenck, S. B. G. (1964) Manual of the Eysenck Personality Inventory. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
[13] Myers, I. B., and McCaulley, M. H. (1985) Manual: a guide to the development and use of the Myers–Brigg Type Indicator. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
[14] Verhoeven, L., and Vermeer, A. (2002) Communicative competence and personality dimensions in first and second language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 23, 361–474.
[15] Ortega, L. (2009). Understanding second language acquisition. London: Hodder Education.
[16] Ryan, J. M., & DeMark, S. (2002). Variation in Achievement Scores Related to Gender, Item Format, and Content Are Tested. In G. Tindal & T. Haladyna (Eds.), Large Scale Assessment Programs for All Students: Validity, Technica Adequacy, and Implementation (pp. 67-88). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[17] Engine, A., & Ortaçtepe, D. (2014). Gender differences in item format and skill area: Some evidence from an EFL achievement test. Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, 4(2), 48-63.
[18] Ramezani, A. E., Dehgahi, M., & Hashemi, H. (2015). An exploratory study of the language-learning style preferences of Iranian EFL high school students. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 6(2), 150.
[19] Shuib, M., & Azizan, S. N. (2015). Learning style preferences among male and female ESL students in universiti-sains malaysia. The Journal of Educators Online, 12(2), 103.
Authors contributing to this journal agree to publish their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International License, allowing third parties to share their work (copy, distribute, transmit) and to adapt it, under the condition that the authors are given credit, that the work is not used for commercial purposes, and that in the event of reuse or distribution, the terms of this license are made clear. With this license, the authors hold the copyright without restrictions and are allowed to retain publishing rights without restrictions as long as this journal is the original publisher of the articles.
