A Comparative Analysis of the New HSK5 and JLPT1 Based on Language Testing Theory

  • Guangyu Zeng Chongqing Normal University
Article ID: 1661
140 Views, 46 PDF Downloads
Keywords: HSK, JLPT, Comparative Analysis, Classroom Backwash

Abstract

The purpose of language testing is to better serve language learning and teaching. The ultimate goal is to help learners improve their practical application ability. Therefore, by analyzing HSK’s own knowledge points and knowledge points which are relatively weak compared with JLPT’s, this paper analyzes the key points of daily teaching, goes out of the pattern of simply studying HSK’s exam oriented skills and teaching methods, and discusses its application in daily teaching. In order to improve the teaching method and make the students acquire knowledge step by step. Some skills need solid basic knowledge, but the best reason to pass the exam is to fully understand the content. Therefore, we should try to analyze the content of the examination, and put the key and difficult points of language learning reflected by the examination site into the daily teaching, so as to truly "teach people to fish".

References

[1] Park en ting. A comparative analysis of the new and old HSK syllabus: focusing on the new level 5[D]. Master’s thesis of Shandong University, 2011.

[2] Chen Tong. Comparative analysis of new Chinese Proficiency Test and Chinese Proficiency Test: Taking listening and reading test questions of new HSK level 5 and tocfl fluency level as examples [D]. Master’s thesis of Yangzhou University, 2013.

[3] PAPK saetbyul. Empirical Study on the backwash effect of new HSK level 5 on overseas students in China[D]. Master’s thesis of Chongqing University, 2016.

[4] Kawaguchi. Investigation and analysis of the current situation of Chinese teaching in Japan and suggestions on the development of teaching materials[D]. Master’s thesis of Dalian Foreign Studies University, 2016.

Published
2021-03-25
How to Cite
Zeng, G. (2021). A Comparative Analysis of the New HSK5 and JLPT1 Based on Language Testing Theory. Learning & Education, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.18282/l-e.v9i4.1661