pisco_log
banner

Comparing the Clinical Effects of Amiodarone and Propafenone in the Arrhythmia’s Treatment

Charmarke Ibrahim, Sakarie Hidig, Xiang Ma

Abstract


Objective: To compare the clinical effects of Amiodarone and Propafenone in the treatment of arrhythmia. Methods: Choose our hospital 100 cases of patients with cardiac arrhythmias. We shall divided into control group (50 cases, Propafenone treatment) and treatment group (50 cases, Amiodarone therapy), to collect the curative effect of two groups of patients, adverse reactions, nausea and vomiting, dizziness, headache, low blood pressure, heart rate slow down) in accordance with the drug treatment and electrocardiogram (ecg) changes before and after the treatment (PR interphase, QT interphase, QRS duration). Results: Control group and the clinical curative effect of treatment group total effectiveness 98%, 86% respectively, the treatment group is significantly higher than the control group. Control group and treatment group the incidence of adverse reactions were 4%, 12%, treatment group was significantly lower than the control group, and two groups of patients duration are improved after treatmentstage PRinterval and QT, QRS.But the treatment group patients with stage PRinterval and QT,such as electrocardiogram QRS duration change was better than control group, which difference hasstatisticalsignificance (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Compared with propafenone, amiodarone in the treatment of arrhythmia patients has better therapeutic effect and higher safety, and improve the clinical symptoms of patients effectively. It is suggested to promote clinical practice.

Keywords


Arrhythmia; Propafenone; Amiodarone; Clinical Curative Effect

Full Text:

PDF

Included Database


References


Sun Hua. Comparison of efficacy of Propafenone and Amiodarone in the treatment of arrhythmia and its effect on serum HS- CRP [J]. Journal of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine: Electronic Edition, 2017, 7(030): 41–41.

Liu Rong-kui. Comparative study on clinical efficacy and safety of Amiodarone and Propafenone in the treatment of arrhythmia [J]. Journal of Practical Cardio-Cerebral and Pulmonary Vascular Diseases, 2016, 24(005): 62–64.

Jia Dongmei, Bai Chunmei. Comparative Analysis of efficacy of Amiodarone and Propafenone in the treatment of arrhythmia [J]. Medical and Health (Abstract), 2016, 000(002): 00056.

Li Ke, Wei Yiyong, Cao Song, et al. Comparative study on the effect of Propafenone and Amiodarone in the treatment of arrhythmia [J]. Chinese Journal of Cardiovascular Disease, 2017, 5(012): 43–44.

Xu Yunyao, Chen Youlian, Huang Shian. Comparison of the clinical efficacy of Propafenone and Amiodarone in the treatment of arrhythmia patients, and the effect on cardiac function indicators and serum hypersensitive C-reactive protein [J]. Knowledge of cardiovascular disease prevention and control (second half), 2020, 010(001): 26–28.

Zhang Weiying. Comparison of the efficacy of Propafenone and Amiodarone in the treatment of arrhythmia and its effect on serum HS-CRP [J]. Frontiers in Medicine, 2017, 007(006): 116–117.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18282/l-e.v9i3.1562

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.