A Reflection on a Trio of Dimensions in Flipped Classroom in Higher Education—A Literature-Based Study
Abstract
It has been a decade since flipped classroom as a structural innovation in teaching and learning is widely applied and researched in higher education across the world. This study aims to explore, based on academic literature, three core dimensions to understanding flipped classroom: pedagogies as the inner core, interpersonal relationships as the bond and complexities involved in its evaluation.References
[1] Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2014). Flipped Learning: Gateway to Student Engagement. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education.
[2] Bonwell, C., & Eison, J. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1. Washington, DC: George Washington University. Full Text: http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED336049.pdf
[3] Delozier, S. J., & Rhodes, M. G. (2017). Flipped Classroom: a Review of Key Ideas and Recommendations for Practice. Educational Psychology Review, 29(1), 141-151.
[4] Deslauriers, L., Schelew, E., & Wieman, C (2011). Improved Learning in a Large-Enrollment Physics Class. Science, 332 (6031), 862-864.
[5] Flores, Ò., del-Arco, I., & Silva, P. (2016). The flipped classroom model at the university: analysis based on professors’ and students’ assessment in the educational field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13 (21).
[6] Hattie, J. (2009). Visible Learning: A Synthesis of over 800 Meta-analyses Relating to Achievement. Oxford: Routledge.
[7] Hsieh, J. S. C., Wu, W. C. V., & Marek, M. W. (2016). Using the flipped classroom to enhance EFL learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning. 30 (1-2), 1-21.
[8] Horn, M., & Staker, H. (2014) Blended: Using Disruptive Innovation to Improve Schools. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
[9] Huwang, G. J., Lai, C. L., & Wang, S. Y. (2015). Seamless flipped learning: a mobile technology-enhanced flipped classroom with effective learning strategies. Journal of Computers in Education, 2 (4), 449-473.
[10] Mazur, E. (2009). Farewell, Lecture?. Science, 323 (5910), 50-51.
[11] McNally, B., Chipperfield, J., Dorsett, P., Del Fabbro, L., Frommolt, V., Goets, S., Lewohl, J., Molineux, M., Pearson, A., Reddan, G., Roiko, A., & Rung, A. (2016). Flipped classroom experiences: student preferences and flip strategy in a higher education context. Higher Education, 73(2), 281-298.
[12] Skrypnyk, O., Joksimovic, S., Kovanovic, V., Dawson, S., Gasevic, D., & Siemens, G. (2015). The History and State of Blended Learning. In. G. Siemens, D.
[13] Gasevic, & S. Dawson (Eds.), Preparing for the digital university: a review of the history and current state of distance, blended, and online learning (pp. 55-92) [Online
Publication]. Retrieved from http://linkresearchlab.org/PreparingDigitalUniversity.pdf
[14] Wasserman, N. H., Quint, C., Norris, S. A., & Carr, T. (2017). Exploring Flipped Classroom Instruction in Calculus III. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15, 545-568.
[15] Yong, D., Levy, R., & Lape, N. (2015). Why no difference? A controlled flipped classroom study for an introductory differential equations course. PRIMUS, 25 (9-10), 907-921.
[16] Zhang, X. X. (2014). PAD class: A new attempt in university teaching reform. Fudan Education Forum, 12(5), 5-10.
Authors contributing to this journal agree to publish their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International License, allowing third parties to share their work (copy, distribute, transmit) and to adapt it, under the condition that the authors are given credit, that the work is not used for commercial purposes, and that in the event of reuse or distribution, the terms of this license are made clear. With this license, the authors hold the copyright without restrictions and are allowed to retain publishing rights without restrictions as long as this journal is the original publisher of the articles.
