Taking “KuangLu Figure” as an Example, This Paper Discusses the Significance of the Collection of Imitation Works in the Study of Art History
Abstract
For a long time, “KuangLu figure” (Figure 1) has been regarded as one of Hongguzi’s representative works. In fact, the masterpiece “KuangLu figure” is not the original work of Hongguzi but a copy of later generations, but it has not affected the status of the masterpiece in the history of art. Therefore, it is necessary to discuss the importance of the imitation in the study of art history.References
[1] Fang wen. Xinyin -- analysis and research on the style and structure of Chinese calligraphy and painting [M], Shanghai calligraphy and painting publishing house, 2016.8.
[2] the complete book of Chinese calligraphy and painting [M], Shanghai calligraphy and painting publishing house, 1993.10.
[3] Yao Liya. Hongguzi “true” the theory of “true” - “KuangLu figure”, for example [J]. Journal of art, 2018 (01): 62-63.
[4] Wen wei, sun xueqiao. From nature to creation -- a theoretical study of Hongguzi landscape painting [J]. Statistics and management, 2015 (10): 182-183.
Authors contributing to this journal agree to publish their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International License, allowing third parties to share their work (copy, distribute, transmit) and to adapt it, under the condition that the authors are given credit, that the work is not used for commercial purposes, and that in the event of reuse or distribution, the terms of this license are made clear. With this license, the authors hold the copyright without restrictions and are allowed to retain publishing rights without restrictions as long as this journal is the original publisher of the articles.
