Green leadership and digital innovation in enhancing environmental performance: Evidence from Ghanaian SMEs through the lens of institutional theory
Abstract
Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) play a critical role in achieving environmental sustainability, particularly in developing economies where regulatory enforcement and resource constraints remain significant challenges. Drawing on Institutional Theory, this study examines how green leadership influences environmental performance in Ghanaian SMEs, with digital innovation as a mediating variable and environmental culture as a moderating variable. Institutional Theory provides the conceptual foundation for explaining how normative pressures embedded in leadership values and organizational culture, alongside mimetic pressures associated with digital innovation adoption, shape firms’ environmental outcomes. Using survey data collected from SMEs in Ghana and analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), the results revealed that green leadership has a significant positive effect on both digital innovation and environmental performance. Digital innovation also significantly enhances environmental performance and partially mediates the relationship between green leadership and environmental performance. Notably, the findings demonstrated that environmental culture significantly moderates the relationship between digital innovation and environmental performance, with the effect stronger in organizations with a well-developed environmental culture. This indicates that internalized environmental values amplify the effectiveness of digital innovation initiatives. The study contributes to the sustainability and organizational literature by extending Institutional Theory to the SME context in a developing economy and by clarifying the conditional role of environmental culture in translating digital innovation into superior environmental performance. Practically, the findings suggest that SME leaders and policymakers should promote environmentally oriented leadership, invest in digital innovation, and cultivate strong environmental cultures to enhance sustainability outcomes.
Copyright (c) 2026 Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
1. Adams, D. J., Donovan, J., & Topple, C. (2022). Implementing sustainability in food manufacturers’ operations and supply chains. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 33(5), 1132–1146. https://doi.org/10.1108/meq-09-2021-0225
2. Ahsan, M. J. (2024). Green leadership and innovation: catalysts for environmental performance in Italian manufacturing. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 33(7), 1646–1669. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoa-04-2024-4450
3. Akbar, A., Ahmad, S., Khalid, M., et al. (2024). Analyzing the Effect of Green HRM on Organizational Performance. Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), 13(2), 864–869. https://doi.org/10.61506/01.00402
4. Hawary, S. I. S. A., & Abdallah, F. A. (2023). The moderating effect of organisational power on the relationship between green human resources practices and achieving strategic objectives. International Journal of Business Information Systems, 43(2), 258–280. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijbis.2023.131349
5. Almaraz, A. (2022). Small and Medium Enterprises in Mexico and the Craft Beer Sector in Baja California: Dynamic Capabilities, Culture, and Innovation. Journal of Evolutionary Studies in Business, 7(1), 166–203. https://doi.org/10.1344/jesb2022.1.j102
6. Alwali, J., & Alwali, W. (2025). Transformational leadership and moral norms: Green human resource management and behaviour. Management Decision, 63(5), 1417–1442. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-09-2023-1682
7. Benn, S., Edwards, M., & Williams, T. (2014). Organizational change for corporate sustainability. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315819181
8. Bleiklie, I., Enders, J., & Lepori, B. (2015). Organizations as Penetrated Hierarchies: Environmental Pressures and Control in Professional Organizations. Organization Studies, 36(7), 873–896. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840615571960
9. Boakye, D. J., TIngbani, I., Ahinful, G., et al. (2020). Sustainable environmental practices and financial performance: Evidence from listed small and medium‐sized enterprise in the United Kingdom. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(6), 2583–2602. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2522
10. Caprar, D. V., & Neville, B. A. (2012). “Norming” and “conforming”: Integrating cultural and institutional explanations for sustainability adoption in business. Journal of Business Ethics, 110(2), 231–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1424-1
11. Chen, Y., Chang, C., & Lin, Y. (2014). Green transformational leadership and green performance: the mediation effects of green mindfulness and green self-efficacy. Sustainability, 6(10), 6604–6621. https://doi.org/10.3390/su6106604
12. Colwell, S. R., & Joshi, A. W. (2011). Corporate Ecological Responsiveness: Antecedent Effects of Institutional Pressure and Top Management Commitment and Their Impact on Organizational Performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 22(2), 73–91. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.732
13. Cui, J. (2025). Exploring the Impact of Digital Leadership and Green Digital Innovation on Corporate Digital Transformation. Journal of Current Social Issues Studies, 2(4), 215–220. https://doi.org/10.71113/jcsis.v2i4.229
14. Daddi, T., Bleischwitz, R., Todaro, N. M., et al. (2020). The influence of institutional pressures on climate mitigation and adaptation strategies. Journal of cleaner production, 244, 118879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118879
15. Daud, S., Yusof, N., & Mokhtar, M. (2019). The Effectiveness of the Environmental Management System (EMS) Implementation in Green Supply Chain: A Case Study. KnE Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i22.5105
16. DiBella, J., Forrest, N., Burch, S., et al. (2022). Exploring the potential of SMEs to build individual, organizational, and community resilience through sustainability‐oriented business practices. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(1), 721–735. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3171
17. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
18. Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., & Samar Ali, S. (2015). Exploring the relationship between leadership, operational practices, institutional pressures and environmental performance: A framework for green supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 160, 120–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.10.001
19. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
20. Gilch, P. M., & Sieweke, J. (2021). Recruiting digital talent: The strategic role of recruitment in organisations' digital transformation. German Journal of Human Resource Management, 35(1), 53–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/2397002220952734
21. Hair, J., & Alamer, A. (2022). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) in second language and education research: Guidelines using an applied example. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 1(3), 100027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2022.100027
22. Hashmi, R. (2023). Business Performance Through Government Policies, Green Purchasing, and Reverse Logistics: Business performance and green supply chain practices. South Asian Journal of Operations and Logistics, 2(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.57044/sajol.2023.2.1.2301
23. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
24. Hsiao, M. (2024). Resource integration and firm performance through organizational capabilities for digital transformation. Digital Transformation and Society. https://doi.org/10.1108/dts-07-2023-0050
25. Hussain, A., Draz, U., Ali, T., et al. (2020). Waste Management and Prediction of Air Pollutants Using IoT and Machine Learning Approach. Energies, 13(15), 3930. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13153930
26. Jamil, M., & Said, M. (2018). The Utilization of Internet of Things (IoT) for Multi Sensor Data Acquisition using Thingspeak. VOLT : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Teknik Elektro, 3(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.30870/volt.v3i1.1962
27. Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Singh, R. P., et al. (2022). Understanding the adoption of Industry 4.0 technologies in improving environmental sustainability. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 203–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.01.008
28. Jia, J., Yuan, S., Wei, L., et al. (2023). When firms adopt sustainable human resource management: A fuzzy‐set analysis. Human Resource Management, 62(3), 283–305. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22164
29. Kauppi, K. (2022). Institutional theory. In: Handbook of Theories for Purchasing, Supply Chain and Management Research. Edward Elgar Publishing. pp. 320–334. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839104503.00025
30. Kooij, D. T. A. M., Guest, D. E., Clinton, M., et al. (2012). How the impact of HR practices on employee well‐being and performance changes with age. Human Resource Management Journal, 23(1), 18–35. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12000
31. Kura, K. M. (2016). Linking environmentally specific transformational leadership and environmental concern to green behaviour at work. Global Business Review, 17(Suppl. 3), 1S–14S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150916631069
32. Lee, J. (2024). The Role of Institutional Logics in Shaping Sustainable Talent Management: A Comparative Study of Two South Korean Conglomerates. Systems, 12(7), 227. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12070227
33. Lee, M., Pak, A., & Roh, T. (2024). The interplay of institutional pressures, digitalization capability, environmental, social, and governance strategy, and triple bottom line performance: A moderated mediation model. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(6), 5247–5268. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3755
34. Liang, Y., Zhao, C., & Lee, M.-J. (2023). Institutional pressures on sustainability and green performance: the mediating role of digital business model innovation. Sustainability, 15(19), 14258. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151914258
35. Lisniak, B. A. (2024). Global environmental problems and their impact on international business. https://doi.org/123456789/96788
36. Loeser, F., Recker, J., Brocke, J. v., et al. (2017). How IT executives create organizational benefits by translating environmental strategies into Green IS initiatives. Information Systems Journal, 27(4), 503–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12136
37. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550
38. Miao, Q., & Nduneseokwu, C. (2025). Environmental Leadership in Private Organizations. In Environmental Leadership in a VUCA Era: An Interdisciplinary Handbook. Springer Nature Singapore. (pp. 317–398). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-0324-4_8
39. Morgan, Y., Fok, L., & Zee, S. (2020). Relationships among annual revenue and green initiatives, quality management, and organizational performance. International Journal of Applied Management and Technology, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.5590/ijamt.2020.19.1.02
40. Morioka, S. N., & Carvalho, M. M. (2016). Measuring sustainability in practice: exploring the inclusion of sustainability into corporate performance systems in Brazilian case studies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 136, 123–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.103
41. Napathorn, C. (2021). The development of green skills across firms in the institutional context of Thailand. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 14(4), 539–572. https://doi.org/10.1108/apjba-10-2020-0370
42. Osafo, V. A., Sarfo, P. A., Bonzo, J. K., et al. (2025). Examining the Nexus between Knowledge Management Processes and Firm Sustainability: The Mediating Role of Innovation among SMEs in Ghana. Journal of Emerging Markets and Management, 1(3), 63–85. https://doi.org/10.63385/jemm.v1i3.225
43. Owusu, A., Tauringana, V., & Asare, N. (2024). Sustainability performance reporting in Ghana: The views of SMEs. Small Enterprise Research, 31(1), 56–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/13215906.2024.2304847
44. Parida, S., & Brown, K. (2021). Green human resource management and green innovation. In: Responsible Management in Emerging Markets: A Multisectoral Focus . Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 159–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76563-7_7
45. Park, A., & Li, H. (2021). The effect of blockchain technology on supply chain sustainability performances. Sustainability, 13(4), 1726. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041726
46. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., et al. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
47. Poperwi, L. (2024). The Effect of Green Transformational Leadership on Green Performance: A Systematic Review. Fostering Long-Term Sustainable Development in Africa: Overcoming Poverty, Inequality, and Unemployment, 309–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-61321-0_15
48. Rauniyar, A., Berge, T., & Hakegard, J. E. (2022). NEMO: Internet of Things based Real-time Noise and Emissions MOnitoring System for Smart Cities. In: Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE 12th Sensor Array and Multichannel Signal Processing Workshop (SAM), 20–23 June 2022. pp. 206–210. https://doi.org/10.1109/sam53842.2022.9827835
49. Rawashdeh, A. M. (2018). The impact of green human resource management on organizational environmental performance in Jordanian health service organizations. Management Science Letters, 8(10), 1049–1058. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2018.7.006
50. Ren, S., Cooke, F. L., Stahl, G. K., et al. (2023). Advancing the sustainability agenda through strategic human resource management: Insights and suggestions for future research. Human Resource Management, 62(3), 251–265. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22169
51. Sahoo, S., Kumar, S., Sivarajah, U., et al. (2022). Blockchain for sustainable supply chain management: trends and ways forward. Electronic Commerce Research, 24(3), 1563–1618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-022-09569-1
52. Santos, D., & Ferreira, J. (2019). Iot power monitoring system for smart environments. Sustainability, 11(19), 5355. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195355
53. Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership. John Wiley & Sons. Volume 2.
54. Scott, J. (2014). A matter of record: Documentary sources in social research. John Wiley & Sons.
55. Singh, S. K., Giudice, M. D., Chierici, R., et al. (2020). Green innovation and environmental performance: The role of green transformational leadership and green human resource management. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 150, 119762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119762
56. Surmanidze, N. (2024). The impact of covid-19 on tourism marketing strategies and the role of digitalization. . Innovative Economics and Management, 11(1), 68–80. https://doi.org/10.46361/2449-2604.11.1.2024.68-80
57. Tasleem, M., Khan, N., & Nisar, A. (2019). Impact of technology management on corporate sustainability performance: The mediating role of TQM. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 36(9), 1574–1599. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijqrm-01-2018-0017
58. Van Tulder, R., Rodrigues, S. B., Mirza, H., et al. (2021). The UN’s sustainable development goals: can multinational enterprises lead the decade of action? Journal of International Business Policy, 4(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1057/s42214-020-00095-1
59. Wijethilake, C., Munir, R., & Appuhami, R. (2017). Strategic responses to institutional pressures for sustainability: The role of management control systems. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 30(8), 1677–1710. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-07-2015-2144
60. Woo, E.-J., & Kang, E. (2020). Environmental issues as an indispensable aspect of sustainable leadership. Sustainability, 12(17), 7014. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12177014
61. Yan, J., & Hu, W. (2021). Environmentally specific transformational leadership and green product development performance: the role of a green HRM system. International Journal of Manpower, 43(3), 639–659. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijm-05-2020-0223
62. Yu, J., & Moon, T. (2021). Impact of digital strategic orientation on organizational performance through digital competence. Sustainability, 13(17), 9766. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179766
63. Zhang, J., Adu Sarfo, P., Amankwah, O., et al. (2025). Harnessing the synergy between green organizational strategy and technological capability for sustainable development in SMEs in Sub-Saharan Africa. Business Process Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/bpmj-01-2025-0043
64. Zhang, Q., Yang, L., Cheng, J., & Feng, T. (2024). How green human resource management and institutional pressure drive performance via green image: the equifinal paths and their performance outcomes. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 62(1), e12389. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12389
65. Zhuravleva, N. A., Chechenova, L. M., & Poliak, M. (2022). Activation of Sustainable Development Mechanisms on the Base of Green Projects of the Rail Transport. https://doi.org/10.5220/0010663300003223
