Social consequences of employment flexibilisation in the era of post-Fordism/neoliberalism

Vitalina Butkaliuk

doi:10.18282/hrms.v4i1.3479

Vitalina Butkaliuk Department of Economic Sociology, Institute of Sociology, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 01001 Kiev, Ukraine

Ariticle ID: 3479

31 Views, 21 PDF Downloads

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18282/hrms.v4i1.3479

Keywords: labour relations; neoliberalism; flexibilisation of employment; non-standard employment

Abstract

The article presents an analysis of the main causes and social consequences of the transformation of employment in the conditions of the transition of the world economy to post-Fordism/neoliberalism at the end of the 20th century. The author discusses the main methodological approaches to the study of this problem and also dwells in detail on the analysis of such important consequences of the transformation of the labour sphere as the increase in the vulnerability of workers’ employment, the growth of inequality, the weakening of the strength of trade unions, etc.

References

1. International Labour Office. Non-standard forms of employment: Analyses of problems and prospects for solutions in different countries (Russian). Available online: https://webapps.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---dcomm/---publ/documents/publication/wcms_554952.pdf (accessed on 10 June 2022).

2. International Labour Organization. From Precarious Work to Decent Work: Outcome Document to the Workers’ Symposium on Policies and Regulations to Combat Precarious Employment. International Labour Organization; 2012.

3. Toshchenko ZT. Precariat: From Protoclass to a New Class (Russian). Nauka; 2018.

4. Kalleberg AL. Precarious Lives: Job Insecurity and Well-Being in Rich Democracies. Polity Press; 2018.

5. Anisimov RI. Non-standard labour: Who wins? Theoretical and methodological analysis of approaches to the study of non-standard employment (Russian). RUDN Journal of Sociology 2019; 19(3): 543–552. doi: 10.22363/2313-2272-2019-19-3-543-552

6. World Health Organization. POLICY BRIEF / Health, decent work and the economy. Available online: www.euro.who.int/en/SDG-policy-briefs (accessed on 25 December 2021).

7. Chezganova O. Trends in the development of modern legislation on trade unions in Great Britain (Russian). Journal of Comparative Labour Law 2012; 8: 9–15.

8. Florida R. Homo Creativus. How a New Class is Conquering the World (Ukrainian). Nash Format; 2018.

9. Hartman D. Postmodernism or the logic of postfordism culture? (Russian). In: Ilchenko MS, Martyanov VS (editors). Postfordism: Concepts Institutions, Practices (Russian). Political Encyclopaedia; 2015. pp. 18–52.

10. Atkinson A. Inequality: How to be with It? (Russian). Delo Publishing House; 2018.

11. Standing G. Precariat: A New Dangerous Class (Russian). Ad Marginem Press LLC; 2014.

12. Case A, Deaton A. Deaths of Despair and the Future of Capitalism. Princeton University Press; 2020.

13. Scheiring G, Hui B, Irdam D, et al. Privatization and the postsocialist fertility decline. Available online: https://www.gaborscheiring.com/post/privatization-and-the-postsocialist-fertility-decline (accessed on 25 December 2021).

14. Scheiring, G, Stuckler D, King L. Deindustrialization and deaths of despair: Mapping the impact of industrial decline on ill health. Available online: https://www.gaborscheiring.com/post/deindustrialization-and-deaths-of-despair/ (accessed on 25 December 2021).

15. Scheiring G. Deaths of despair and the health of democracy: Challenges for sociology. In: Global Dialogue. International Sociological Association; 2021. pp. 11–13.

16. Scheiring G. The political economy of the post-socialist mortality crisis. Available online: https://www.gaborscheiring.com/post/the-political-economy-of-the-post-socialist-mortality-crisis (accessed on 25 December 2021).

17. Butkaliuk V. Social consequences of the transformations in the world of work in the context of the economic globalization (Russian). Sociological Studies 2021; 1: 121–131. doi: 10.31857/S013216250010719-3