Challenges and implications of microwork in the age of artificial intelligence: A global socioeconomic analysis
Abstract
This study adopts a discursive and analytical perspective to explore how technological advances are reconfiguring the dynamics of the global labour market, with special attention to the phenomenon of microwork. Microwork, characterised by short, fragmented tasks carried out through digital platforms and geographically distributed, has seen exponential growth, particularly in nations with lower economic development. This type of work shows a growing distinction between tasks of a complex and creative nature and those of a repetitive and monotonous nature that do not require advanced skills to perform. This differentiation can intensify wage disparities between developed and developing countries, as well as contributing to the precariousness of work in activities considered less complex and valued. The article highlights the emergence of unstable and poorly paid jobs that do not require specific qualifications and discusses their impact on social security systems in countries where labour regulations are insufficient. Using a theoretical-methodological approach, the research examines the role of artificial intelligence in the rise of micro-labour and its socio-economic implications. It concludes that despite the flexibility and short-term earning opportunities offered by microwork, it poses considerable challenges in terms of income security, workers’ rights, and social protection, emphasising the need for regulatory measures to mitigate its adverse effects on vulnerable communities.
References
BBC. (2019). The ‘microworkers’ making your digital life possible. Available online: https://www.bbc.com/news/business-48881827 (accessed on 7 March 2024).
Berg, J., Furrer, M., Harmon, E., et al. (2018). Digital labour platforms and the future of work. Towards decent work in the online world. ILO report.
Braz, M. V. (2021). Heteromation and micro-labour in Brazil. Sociologias, 23(57), 134-172. https://doi.org/10.1590/15174522-111017
Casilli, A. A. (2017). Global digital culture| Digital labour studies go global: Toward a digital decolonial turn. International Journal of Communication, 11, 21.
Casilli, A. A. (2021). Waiting for robots: the ever-elusive myth of automation and the global exploitation of digital labor. Sociologias, 23(57), 112-133. https://doi.org/10.1590/15174522-114092
Chakraborty, R., Rajan, S., Bhatwalkar, S., et al. (2022). Flexing in the Gig Economy Ripple Effect. NHRD Network Journal, 15(1), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.1177/26314541211067373
Collier, R. B., Dubal, V. B., & Carter, C. (2017). Labor Platforms and Gig Work: The Failure to Regulate. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3039742
De Stefano, V. (2015). The Rise of the “Just-in-Time Workforce”: On-Demand Work, Crowd Work and Labour Protection in the “Gig-Economy.” SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2682602
Directive (EU) 2019/1152 of the European Parliament and of the Council. (2019). On transparent and predictable working conditions in the European Union.
Ettlinger, N. (2017). Paradoxes, problems, and potentialities of online work platforms. Work Organisation, Labour, and Globalisation, 11(2), 21-38.
EU (European Union). (2019). Regulation (EU) 2019/1150 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2019 on promoting fairness and transparency for business users of online intermediation services.
Fieseler, C., Bucher, E., & Hoffmann, C. P. (2017). Unfairness by Design? The Perceived Fairness of Digital Labor on Crowdworking Platforms. Journal of Business Ethics, 156(4), 987-1005. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3607-2
Fort, K., Adda, G., & Cohen, K. B. (2011). Amazon Mechanical Turk: Gold mine or coal mine? Computational Linguistics, 37(2), 413-420.
Ganesh, N. M. (2023). Formalisation of Workforce and Legal Protection Including Social Security for Unorganised or Informal Workers. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2023.v05i03.3456
Graham, M., Hjorth, I., & Lehdonvirta, V. (2017). Digital labour and development: Impacts of global digital labour platforms and the gig economy on worker livelihoods. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 23(2), 135-162. https://doi.org/10.1177/1024258916687250
Grohmann, R. (2020). Platformisation of work: Between datafication, financialisation and neoliberal rationality. International Electronic Journal of the Political Economy of Information, Communication and Culture, 22(1), 106-122.
Grusin, R. (2022). Insecurity. University of Minnesota Press.
Hayek, F. A. (1994). The road to serfdom, 50th anniversary ed./with a new introd. by Milton Friedman.
Howcroft, D., & Bergvall-Kåreborn, B. (2019). A Typology of Crowdwork Platforms. Work, Employment and Society, 33(1), 21-38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017018760136
International Labour Organization (ILO). (2018). The future of work we want: A global dialogue. Geneva: ILO.
Irani, L. (2015). The cultural labour of micro-labour. New media and society, 17 (5), 720-739. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813511926
Kalleberg, A. L., & Dunn, M. (2016). Good jobs, bad jobs in the gig economy. Perspectives on Work, 20, 10-14.
Kathuria, R., Kedia, M., Varma, G., et al. (2017). Future of work in a digital era: The potential and challenges for online freelancing and microwork in India.
Kost, D., Fieseler, C., & Wong, S. I. (2020). Boundaryless careers in the gig economy: An oxymoron? Human Resource Management Journal, 30(1), 100-113. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12265
Lehdonvirta, V. (2016). Algorithms that divide and unite delocalisation, identity, and collective action in ‘microwork’. Space, place, and global digital work, 53-80.
Machado, S., Zanoni, A. P., Bridi, M. A., et al. (2022). Work controlled by digital platforms: dimensions, profiles and rights (Portuguese). Clínica Direito do Trabalho (Universidade Federal do Paraná).
Muldoon, J., & Apostolidis, P. (2023). ‘Neither work nor leisure’: Motivations of microworkers in the United Kingdom on three digital platforms. New Media & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231183942
Oliveira, R. C. de. (2021). Gamification and uber-work in app companies. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 61(4). https://doi.org/10.1590/s0034-759020210407x
Poras, G., Maurer, L., Murdoch, G., et al. (2021). Policy Note: Taxation of Workers in the Gig Economy: A European Perspective. Intertax, 49(Issue 1), 71-81. https://doi.org/10.54648/taxi2021007
Quinlan, M., Mayhew, C., & Bohle, P. (2001). The Global Expansion of Precarious Employment, Work Disorganization, and Consequences for Occupational Health: A Review of Recent Research. International Journal of Health Services, 31(2), 335-414. https://doi.org/10.2190/607h-ttv0-qcn6-ylt4
Rosenfield, C., & Mossi, T. W. (2020). Decent work in contemporary capitalism: Dignity and recognition in platform microwork. Society and State, 35(3), 741-764. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-6992-202035030004
Schor, J. B. (2017). Does the sharing economy increase inequality within the eighty percent? Findings from a qualitative study of platform providers. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 10(2), 263-279. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsw047
Schor, J. B., & Attwood‐Charles, W. (2017). The “sharing” economy: labor, inequality, and social connection on for‐profit platforms. Sociology Compass, 11(8). https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12493
Sewpersadh, N. S. (2023). Disruptive business value models in the digital era. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-022-00252-1
Standing, G. (2011). The precariat: The new dangerous class. Bloomsbury Academic. p. 208.
Sundararajan, A. (2017). The sharing economy: the end of employment and the rise of crowd-based capitalism. MIT Press.
Sutherland, W., & Jarrahi, M. H. (2018). The sharing economy and digital platforms: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Information Management, 43, 328-341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.07.004
Tejaswini, S., & Abirami, V. (2023). An Analysis of Gig Workers and Challenges Surrounding Their Employment. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 5(6). https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2023.v05i06.9766
Todolí-Signes, A. (2017). The ‘gig economy’: employee, self-employed or the need for a special employment regulation? Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 23(2), 193-205. https://doi.org/10.1177/1024258917701381
Tubaro, P., Casilli, A. A., & Coville, M. (2020). The trainer, the verifier, the imitator: Three ways in which human platform workers support artificial intelligence. Big Data & Society, 7(1), 2053951720919776. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720919776
Tubaro, P., Le Ludec, C., & Casilli, A. A. (2020). Counting ‘micro-workers’: social and methodological challenges around new forms of labour. Work Organisation, Labour, and Globalisation, 14 (1), 67-82. https://doi.org/10.13169/workorgalaboglob.14.1.0067
Webster, J. (2016). Microworkers of the Gig Economy. New Labor Forum, 25(3), 56-64. https://doi.org/10.1177/1095796016661511
Wood, A. J., Lehdonvirta, V., & Graham, M. (2018). Workers of the Internet unite? Online freelancer organisation among remote gig economy workers in six Asian and African countries. New Technology, Work and Employment, 33(2), 95-112. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12112
Copyright (c) 2024 Eucidio Pimenta Arruda, Durcelina Pimenta
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to this journal agree to publish their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, allowing third parties to share their work (copy, distribute, transmit) and to adapt it, under the condition that the authors are given credit, and that in the event of reuse or distribution, the terms of this license are made clear. With this license, the authors hold the copyright without restrictions and are allowed to retain publishing rights without restrictions as long as this journal is the original publisher of the articles.
