Challenges and implications of microwork in the age of artificial intelligence: A global socioeconomic analysis
Abstract
This study adopts a discursive and analytical perspective to explore how technological advances are reconfiguring the dynamics of the global labour market, with special attention to the phenomenon of microwork. Microwork, characterised by short, fragmented tasks carried out through digital platforms and geographically distributed, has seen exponential growth, particularly in nations with lower economic development. This type of work shows a growing distinction between tasks of a complex and creative nature and those of a repetitive and monotonous nature that do not require advanced skills to perform. This differentiation can intensify wage disparities between developed and developing countries, as well as contribute to the precariousness of work in activities considered less complex and valued. The article highlights the emergence of unstable and poorly paid jobs that do not require specific qualifications and discusses their impact on social security systems in countries where labour regulations are insufficient. Using a theoretical-methodological approach, the research examines the role of artificial intelligence in the rise of micro-labour and its socio-economic implications. It concludes that despite the flexibility and short-term earning opportunities offered by microwork, it poses considerable challenges in terms of income security, workers’ rights, and social protection, emphasising the need for regulatory measures to mitigate its adverse effects on vulnerable communities.
Copyright (c) 2024 Eucidio Pimenta Arruda, Durcelina Pimenta
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
1. BBC. (2019). The ‘microworkers’ making your digital life possible. Available online: https://www.bbc.com/news/business-48881827 (accessed on 7 January 2024).
2. Berg, J., Furrer, M., Harmon, E., et al. (2018). Digital labour platforms and the future of work. Towards decent work in the online world. ILO report.
3. Braz, M. V. (2021). Heteromation and micro-labour in Brazil. Sociologias, 23(57), 134–172. https://doi.org/10.1590/15174522-111017
4. Casilli, A. A. (2017). Global digital culture| Digital labour studies go global: Toward a digital decolonial turn. International Journal of Communication, 11, 21.
5. Casilli, A. A. (2021). Waiting for robots: the ever-elusive myth of automation and the global exploitation of digital labor. Sociologias, 23(57), 112–133. https://doi.org/10.1590/15174522-114092
6. Chakraborty, R., Rajan, S., Bhatwalkar, S., et al. (2022). Flexing in the Gig Economy Ripple Effect. NHRD Network Journal, 15(1), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/26314541211067373
7. Collier, R. B., Dubal, V. B., & Carter, C. (2017). Labor Platforms and Gig Work: The Failure to Regulate. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3039742
8. De Stefano, V. (2015). The Rise of the “Just-in-Time Workforce”: On-Demand Work, Crowd Work and Labour Protection in the “Gig-Economy.” SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2682602
9. Directive (EU) 2019/1152 of the European Parliament and of the Council. (2019). On transparent and predictable working conditions in the European Union.
10. Ettlinger, N. (2017). Paradoxes, problems, and potentialities of online work platforms. Work Organisation, Labour, and Globalisation, 11(2), 21–38.
11. EU (European Union). (2019). Regulation (EU) 2019/1150 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2019 on promoting fairness and transparency for business users of online intermediation services.
12. Fieseler, C., Bucher, E., & Hoffmann, C. P. (2017). Unfairness by Design? The Perceived Fairness of Digital Labor on Crowdworking Platforms. Journal of Business Ethics, 156(4), 987–1005. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3607-2
13. Fort, K., Adda, G., & Cohen, K. B. (2011). Amazon Mechanical Turk: Gold mine or coal mine? Computational Linguistics, 37(2), 413–420.
14. Ganesh, N. M. (2023). Formalisation of Workforce and Legal Protection Including Social Security for Unorganised or Informal Workers. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2023.v05i03.3456
15. Graham, M., Hjorth, I., & Lehdonvirta, V. (2017). Digital labour and development: Impacts of global digital labour platforms and the gig economy on worker livelihoods. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 23(2), 135–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/1024258916687250
16. Grohmann, R. (2020). Platformisation of work: Between datafication, financialisation and neoliberal rationality. International Electronic Journal of the Political Economy of Information, Communication and Culture, 22(1), 106–122.
17. Grusin, R. (2022). Insecurity. University of Minnesota Press.
18. Hayek, F. A. (1994). The Road to Serfdom, Fiftieth Anniversary Edition. University of Chicago Press.
19. Howcroft, D., & Bergvall-Kåreborn, B. (2019). A Typology of Crowdwork Platforms. Work, Employment and Society, 33(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017018760136
20. International Labour Organization. (2018). The Future of Work We Want: A Global Dialogue. International Labour Organization.
21. Irani, L. (2015). The cultural labour of micro-labour. New media and society, 17(5), 720–739. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813511926
22. Kalleberg, A. L., & Dunn, M. (2016). Good jobs, bad jobs in the gig economy. Perspectives on Work, 20, 10–14.
23. Kathuria, R., Kedia, M., Varma, G., et al. (2017). Future of work in a digital era: The potential and challenges for online freelancing and microwork in India.
24. Kost, D., Fieseler, C., & Wong, S. I. (2020). Boundaryless careers in the gig economy: An oxymoron? Human Resource Management Journal, 30(1), 100–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12265
25. Lehdonvirta, V. (2016). Algorithms that divide and unite delocalisation, identity, and collective action in ‘microwork’. Space, place, and global digital work, 53–80.
26. Machado, S., Zanoni, A. P., Bridi, M. A., et al. (2022). Work Controlled by Digital Platforms: Dimensions, Profiles and Rights (Portuguese). Clínica Direito do Trabalho (Universidade Federal do Paraná).
27. Muldoon, J., & Apostolidis, P. (2023). ‘Neither work nor leisure’: Motivations of microworkers in the United Kingdom on three digital platforms. New Media & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231183942
28. Oliveira, R. C. de. (2021). Gamification and uber-work in app companies. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 61(4). https://doi.org/10.1590/s0034-759020210407x
29. Poras, G., Maurer, L., Murdoch, G., et al. (2021). Policy Note: Taxation of Workers in the Gig Economy: A European Perspective. Intertax, 49(Issue 1), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.54648/taxi2021007
30. Quinlan, M., Mayhew, C., & Bohle, P. (2001). The Global Expansion of Precarious Employment, Work Disorganization, and Consequences for Occupational Health: A Review of Recent Research. International Journal of Health Services, 31(2), 335–414. https://doi.org/10.2190/607h-ttv0-qcn6-ylt4
31. Rosenfield, C., & Mossi, T. W. (2020). Decent work in contemporary capitalism: Dignity and recognition in platform microwork. Society and State, 35(3), 741–764. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-6992-202035030004
32. Schor, J. B. (2017). Does the sharing economy increase inequality within the eighty percent? Findings from a qualitative study of platform providers. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 10(2), 263–279. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsw047
33. Schor, J. B., & Attwood‐Charles, W. (2017). The “sharing” economy: labor, inequality, and social connection on for‐profit platforms. Sociology Compass, 11(8). https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12493
34. Sewpersadh, N. S. (2023). Disruptive business value models in the digital era. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-022-00252-1
35. Standing, G. (2011). The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. Bloomsbury Academic. p. 208.
36. Sundararajan, A. (2017). The Sharing Economy: The End of Employment and the Rise of Crowd-Based Capitalism. MIT Press.
37. Sutherland, W., & Jarrahi, M. H. (2018). The sharing economy and digital platforms: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Information Management, 43, 328–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.07.004
38. Tejaswini, S., & Abirami, V. (2023). An Analysis of Gig Workers and Challenges Surrounding Their Employment. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 5(6). https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2023.v05i06.9766
39. Todolí-Signes, A. (2017). The ‘gig economy’: employee, self-employed or the need for a special employment regulation? Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 23(2), 193–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/1024258917701381
40. Tubaro, P., Casilli, A. A., & Coville, M. (2020). The trainer, the verifier, the imitator: Three ways in which human platform workers support artificial intelligence. Big Data & Society, 7(1), 2053951720919776. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720919776
41. Tubaro, P., Le Ludec, C., & Casilli, A. A. (2020). Counting ‘micro-workers’: social and methodological challenges around new forms of labour. Work Organisation, Labour, and Globalisation, 14 (1), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.13169/workorgalaboglob.14.1.0067
42. Webster, J. (2016). Microworkers of the Gig Economy. New Labor Forum, 25(3), 56–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/1095796016661511
43. Wood, A. J., Lehdonvirta, V., & Graham, M. (2018). Workers of the Internet unite? Online freelancer organisation among remote gig economy workers in six Asian and African countries. New Technology, Work and Employment, 33(2), 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12112
