Fun Fun Fun—The relationship between well-being activities and job satisfaction in high-tech companies

Yonatan  Shertzer; Yuli  Zur; Chen  Ragones

doi:10.18282/hrms.v4i1.3448

Yonatan Shertzer Peres Academic Center, Rehovot 7610202, Israel; Human Resources Program at Peres Academic Center, Rehovot 7610202, Israel
Yuli Zur Peres Academic Center, Rehovot 7610202, Israel; Human Resources Program at Peres Academic Center, Rehovot 7610202, Israel
Chen Ragones Peres Academic Center, Rehovot 7610202, Israel; Human Resources Program at Peres Academic Center, Rehovot 7610202, Israel

Ariticle ID: 3448

323 Views, 120 PDF Downloads

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18282/hrms.v4i1.3448

Keywords: employee experience; well-being; perks; job satisfaction; high-tech

Abstract

Job satisfaction is a goal of every organization and human resources department. Many studies have shown the relationship between employee satisfaction as a predictive factor for a variety of key organizational indicators such as employee commitment, employee engagement, productivity, attrition, and turnover. Engaging in well-being activities is one strategy that companies can use to boost employee satisfaction. The term “well-being” activities in Hebrew is a bit different from the common use of the word in the literature. It is a combination of the concepts of Fun Activities, Employee Experience and Perks and Benefits. In High-tech companies, there are many activities aimed at creating a positive employee experience and an attractive organizational culture. These activities include a vast range of activities such as: department events, happy hours, company events, holiday gifts, enrichment activities, sports classes (for example, yoga), and more benefits. Despite the considerable investment in this budget, there are not many studies illustrating the contribution of well-being activities to employee satisfaction and their ROI. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between workplace well-being activities and job satisfaction in the Israeli high-tech market. The hypothesis of this study was that there is a positive relationship between well-being activities in the workplace and satisfaction in the workplace, but also to identify which issues within the well-being policy will predict the highest level of employee satisfaction. The study was conducted among 91 employees from a variety of high-tech companies in the Israeli market. The study’s findings supported the hypothesis. Practical suggestions for organizations for the successful implementation of well-being policies are discussed.

References

1. Karl KA, Peluchette JV, Harland L. Is fun for everyone? Personality differences in healthcare providers’ attitudes toward fun. Journal of Health & Human Services Administration 2007; 29(4): 409–447.

2. Chan SCH. Participative leadership and job satisfaction. Leadership & Organization Development Journal 2019; 40(3): 319–333. doi: 10.1108/lodj-06-2018-0215

3. Robins PS, Judge AT. Organizational Behavioral, 15th ed. Pearson; 2013.

4. Zhu Y. A review of job satisfaction. Asian Social Science 2012; 9(1). doi: 10.5539/ass.v9n1p293

5. Hoppock R. Job Satisfaction. Harper and Row; 1935.

6. Vroom VH. Work and Motivation. Wiley; 1964.

7. Moorman RH. The influence of cognitive and affective based job satisfaction measures on the relationship between satisfaction and organizational citizenship behavior. Human Relations 1993; 46(6): 759–776. doi: 10.1177/001872679304600604

8. Andersson F, Freedman M, Haltiwanger J, et al. Reaching for the stars: Who pays for talent in innovative industries? The Economic Journal 2009; 119(538): F308–F332. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2009.02277.x

9. Ford RC, McLaughlin FS, Newstrom JW. Questions and answers about fun at work. Human Resource Planning 2003; 26(4): 18–33.

10. Michel JW, Tews MJ, Allen DG. Fun in the workplace: A review and expanded theoretical perspective. Human Resource Management Review 2019; 29(1): 98–110. doi: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2018.03.001

11. Plester B. Healthy humour: Using humour to cope at work. Kotuitui: New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online 2009; 4(1): 89–102. doi: 10.1080/1177083x.2009.9522446

12. Fluegge ER. Who Put the Fun in Functional? Fun at Work and Its Effects on Job Performance [PhD thesis]. University of Florida; 2008.

13. Plester B, Hutchison A. Fun times: the relationship between fun and workplace engagement. Employee Relations 2016; 38(3): 332–350. doi: 10.1108/er-03-2014-0027

14. Soni K, Chawla R, Sengar R. Relationship between job satisfaction and employee experience. Journal of General Management Research 2017; 4(2): 41–48.

15. Marino AM, Zábojník J. Work‐related perks, agency problems, and optimal incentive contracts. The RAND Journal of Economics 2008; 39(2): 565–585. doi: 10.1111/j.0741-6261.2008.00028.x

16. Cheng LTW, Chan RYK, Leung TY. Impact of perk expenditures and marketing expenditures on corporate performance in China: The moderating role of political connections. Journal of Business Research 2018; 86: 83–95. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.046

17. Ye X, Tambe P. Why do high-tech firms offer perks at work? Available online: https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2015/proceedings/EconofIS/13/ (accessed on 18 August 2022).

18. Kuntze R, Matulich E. Google: Searching for value. Journal of Case Research in Business and Economics 2010; 2: 1–10.

19. Blau PM. Exchange and Power in Social Life. Wiley; 1964.

20. Cohen A. Antecedents of organizational commitment across occupational groups: A meta‐analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior 1992; 13(6): 539–558. doi: 10.1002/job.4030130602

21. Chan SCH, Mak W ming. Have you experienced fun in the workplace? Journal of Chinese Human Resource Management 2016; 7(1): 27–38. doi: 10.1108/jchrm-03-2016-0002

22. Tews MJ, Michel JW, Allen DG. Fun and friends: The impact of workplace fun and constituent attachment on turnover in a hospitality context. Human Relations 2014; 67(8): 923–946. doi: 10.1177/0018726713508143

23. Fluegge-Woolf ER. Play hard, work hard. Management Research Review 2014; 37(8): 682–705. doi: 10.1108/mrr-11-2012-0252

24. Newstrom JW. Making work fun: An important role for managers. SAM Advanced Management Journal 2002; 67(1): 4–10.

25. Sun KK. The Power of Perks: Equity Theory and Job Satisfaction in Silicon Valley [Bachelor’s thesis]. Scripps College; 2016.

26. Greenberg J. Equity and workplace status: A field experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology 1988; 73(4): 606–613. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.73.4.606

27. Berg PO, Kreiner K. Corporate architecture: Turning physical settings into symbolic resources. In: Gagliardi P (editor). Symbols and Artifacts. Routledge; 2017. pp. 41–67. doi: 10.4324/9781315130538-2

28. Weiss D, Dawis RV, England GW, Lofquist LH. Minnesota satisfaction questionnaire--Long form. Available online: https://doi.org/10.1037/t05540-000 (accessed on 1 August 2022).

29. Robert C, Dunne TC, Iun J. The impact of leader humor on subordinate job satisfaction. Group & Organization Management 2015; 41(3): 375–406. doi: 10.1177/1059601115598719

30. Abidi SFB. Impact of Workplace Fun on Project Task Performance with The Mediating Role of Employee Engagement and Moderating Role of Positive Humor [Master’s thesis]. Capital University; 2020.

31. Wang CC, Godecker A, Rose SL. Adaptive and maladaptive humor styles are closely associated with burnout and professional fulfillment in members of the society of gynecologic oncology. Gynecologic Oncology Reports 2022; 42: 101020. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2022.101020