Examining the impact of generative artificial intelligence on work dynamics

David Richard Lozie; Robina Omasa; Sara Hesami; Shenjuti Zaman; Mahsa Kajbaf; Amina Raza Malik

doi:10.18282/hrms.v6i2.3420

David Richard Lozie School of Business, Trent University, Durham GTA
Robina Omasa School of Business, Trent University, Durham GTA
Sara Hesami School of Business, Trent University, Durham GTA
Shenjuti Zaman School of Business, Trent University, Durham GTA
Mahsa Kajbaf School of Business, Trent University, Durham GTA
Amina Raza Malik School of Business, Trent University, Durham GTA

Ariticle ID: 3420

925 Views, 153 PDF Downloads

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18282/hrms.v6i2.3420

Keywords: employee well-being, generative AI, human resource management, work dynamics

Abstract

The main purpose of this paper was to examine the impact of generative artificial intelligence (AI) on employee well-being and work dynamics. Using qualitative methodology, three semi-structured interviews were conducted to investigate the implications of generative AI on employee outcomes such as efficiency, job satisfaction, ethical considerations, and work-life balance. The findings highlighted the potential benefits and risks associated with generative AI implementation in the workplace. The study contributed to the literature by adopting a qualitative approach, allowing in-depth exploration of individual experiences with generative AI in the workplace. The study discussed the implications for employers, employees, and society.

Author Biographies

David Richard Lozie, School of Business, Trent University, Durham GTA

Mr Lozie is a Masters of Management Student in the School of Business at Trent University, Canada.

Robina Omasa, School of Business, Trent University, Durham GTA

Ms Omasa is a Masters of Management Student in the School of Business at Trent University, Canada.

Sara Hesami, School of Business, Trent University, Durham GTA

Ms Hesami is a Masters of Management Student in the School of Business at Trent University, Canada.

Shenjuti Zaman, School of Business, Trent University, Durham GTA

Ms Zaman is a Masters of Management Student in the School of Business at Trent University, Canada.

Mahsa Kajbaf, School of Business, Trent University, Durham GTA

Ms Kajbaf is a Masters of Management Student in the School of Business at Trent University, Canada.

Amina Raza Malik, School of Business, Trent University, Durham GTA

Dr Amina Malik is an Associate Professor of HRM in the School of Business at Trent University.

References

Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2019). The wrong kind of AI? Artificial intelligence and the future of labor demand. Available online: https://doi.org/10.3386/w25682 (accessed on 7 February 2024).

Akerman, A., Gaarder, I., & Mogstad, M. (2015). The Skill Complementarity of Broadband Internet *. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130(4), 1781–1824. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjv028

Arslan, A., Cooper, C., Khan, Z., Golgeci, I., & Ali, I. (2021). Artificial intelligence and human workers interaction at team level: a conceptual assessment of the challenges and potential HRM strategies. International Journal of Manpower, 43(1), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijm-01-2021-0052

Ashraf, A. (2022). Why artificial intelligence requires human intervention. Available online: https://www.royalcyber.com/blogs/ai-systems-need-human-intervention/ (accessed on 21 November 2023).

Bailey J. (2023). From automation to reinvention: How AI is shifting the nature of work. Available online: https://www.vestigopartners.com/news/2023/4/5/from-automation-to-reinvention-how-ai-is-shifting-the-nature-of-work (accessed on 22 October 2023)

Bartel, A., Ichniowski, C., & Shaw, K. (2007). How Does Information Technology Affect Productivity? Plant-Level Comparisons of Product Innovation, Process Improvement, and Worker Skills. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(4), 1721–1758. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2007.122.4.1721

Bedard, J., Lavoie, K., Laverdiere, R, et. al. (2023). How generative AI will transform HR. Available online: https://www.bcg.com/publications/2023/transforming-human-resources-using-generative-ai (accessed on 22 October 2023).

Boden, M. A. (2016). AI: Its Nature and Future. Oxford University Press.

Brougham, D., & Haar, J. (2020). Technological disruption and employment: The influence on job insecurity and turnover intentions: A multi-country study. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 161, 120276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120276

Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies. W. W. Norton & Company.

Budhwar, P., Chowdhury, S., Wood, G., et al. (2023). Human resource management in the age of generative artificial intelligence: Perspectives and research directions on ChatGPT. Human Resource Management Journal, 33(3), 606–659. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12524

Collis, J., and Hussey, R. (2003). Business research: A practical guide for undergraduate and postgraduate students. Palgrave Macmillan.

Danaher, J., Hogan, M. J., Noone, C., et al. (2017). Algorithmic governance: Developing a research agenda through the power of collective intelligence. Big Data & Society, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717726554

Enholm, I. M., Papagiannidis, E., Mikalef, P., & Krogstie, J. (2021). Artificial Intelligence and Business Value: a Literature Review. Information Systems Frontiers, 24(5), 1709–1734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-021-10186-w

Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerization? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 254–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019

Glaser, B. G. (2002). Conceptualization: On Theory and Theorizing Using Grounded Theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690200100203

Goldstein, J. (2023). New IBM study reveals how AI is changing work and what HR leaders should do about it. Available online: https://www.ibm.com/blog/new-ibm-study-reveals-how-ai-is-changing-work-and-what-hr-leaders-should-do-about-it/ (accessed on 29 October 2023).

Holford, W. D. (2019). The future of human creative knowledge work within the digital economy. Futures, 105, 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2018.10.002

Hupfer S. (2020). Talent and workforce effects in the age of AI. Available online: https://resources.experfy.com/future-of-work/talent-and-workforce-effects-in-the-age-of-ai/ (accessed on 27 November 2023).

Kanodia, A. (2023). What is generative AI? Everything you need to know. Available online: https://www.webcluesinfotech.com/what-is-generative-ai-everything-you-need-to-know (accessed on 22 October, 2023).

Kaur, M., Gandolfi, F. (2023). Artificial intelligence in human resource management—Challenges and future research recommendations. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/372230471 (accessed on 10 November 2023).

Lenth, R. V. (2001). Some Practical Guidelines for Effective Sample Size Determination. The American Statistician, 55(3), 187–193. https://doi.org/10.1198/000313001317098149

Loring, E. (2018). How AI will help sales representatives. Available online: https://readwrite.com/2018/09/27/how-ai-will-help-sales-representatives/ (accessed on 28 November 2023).

Loten, A. (2017). AI to drive job growth by 2020: Gartner. Available online: https://blogs.wsj.com/cio/2017/12/15/ai-to-drive-job-growth-by-2020-gartner/ (accessed on 15 December 2017).

Marr, B. (2023). The top 10 limitations of ChatGPT. Available online: https://www.forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/2023/03/03/the-top-10-limitations-of-chatgpt/?sh=569e9d508f35 (accessed on 26 October 2023).

Marshall, C., Rossman, G. (2011). Designing Qualitative Research, 5th ed. SAGE Publications.

McKendrick, J. & Thurai, A. (2022). AI isn’t ready to make unsupervised decisions. Available online: https://hbr.org/2022/09/ai-isnt-ready-to-make-unsupervised-decisions (accessed on 20 November 2023).

Navarra, K. (2023). ChatGPT and HR: A primer for HR professionals. Available online: https://www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/hr-topics/technology/pages/chatgpt-hr-primer-ai-workplace.aspx (accessed on 22 October 2023).

Oganezi, B. U., Lozie, D. R. (2017). Employee retention strategy and performance of commercial banks in Ebonyi state, Nigeria. FUNAI Journal of Accounting, Business & Finance (Fujabf). 1(1), 279–287.

OpenAI. (2023). Research: GPT-4. Available online: https://openai.com/research/gpt-4 (accessed on 25 October 2023).

Pocket HRMS. (2023). Advantages of Google bard AI in HR. Available online: https://www.pockethrms.com/blog/google-bard-ai-in-hr/ (accessed on 29 October 2023).

Rampersad, G. (2020). Robot will take your job: Innovation for an era of artificial intelligence. Journal of Business Research, 116, 68–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.019

Rhomberg, C. (2022). Why hasn’t all this technology given us more leisure time? Available online: https://www.uipath.com/blog/digital-transformation/what-happened-four-hour-workw (accessed on 27 November 2023).

Sarfo, J. O., Gbordzoe, N. I., Debrah, T. P., Afful, W. T & Obeng, P. (2021). Qualitative research designs, sample size and saturation: is enough always enough? Journal of Advocacy, Research and Education, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.13187/jare.2021.3.60

Schmidt, P., Biessmann, F., & Teubner, T. (2020). Transparency and trust in artificial intelligence systems. Journal of Decision Systems, 29(4), 260–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2020.1819094

Schwab, K. (2017). The fourth industrial revolution, 1st ed. World Economic Forum.

Shetty, S. (2024). Determining sample size for qualitative research: What is the magical number? Available online: https://interq-research.com/determining-sample-size-for-qualitative-research-what-is-the-magical-number (accessed on 20 January 2024).

Shrinivaas K., Sudarmani, B., & Gopinathan, N. (2021). A study on the implementation of AI in an organization and its effects on employee morale. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry (TOJQI). 12(6): 5109–5112.

Somdip, D. (2023). Which ethical implications of generative ai should companies focus on? Available online: https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbestechcouncil/2023/10/17/which-ethical-implications-of-generative-ai-should-companies-focus-on/?sh=7cafe792239f (accessed on 20 November 2023).

Sommer, C. A., Ward, J. E., & Scofield, T. (2010). Metaphoric Stories in Supervision of Internship: A Qualitative Study. Journal of Counseling & Development, 88(4), 500–507. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6678.2010.tb00052.x

Stanford University. (2023). Generative AI: perspectives from Stanford HAI. Stanford University Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence. Available online: https://hai.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/2023- 03/Generative_AI_HAI_Perspectives.pdf (accessed on 19 October 2023).

van Manen, M. (1977). Linking Ways of Knowing with Ways of Being Practical. Curriculum Inquiry, 6(3), 205–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/03626784.1977.11075533

von Krogh, G., Roberson, Q., & Gruber, M. (2023). Recognizing and Utilizing Novel Research Opportunities with Artificial Intelligence. Academy of Management Journal, 66(2), 367–373. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2023.4002

Walsh, T., Levy, N., Bell, G., et al. (2019). The effective and ethical development of artificial intelligence. Available online: acola.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/hs4_artificial-intelligence-report.pdf (accessed on 10 November 2023).

Yadav, R., Chaudhary, N. S., Kumar, D., & Saini, D. (2022). Mediating and moderating variables of employee relations and sustainable organizations: a systematic literature review and future research agenda. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 31(7), 3023–3050. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoa-12-2021-3091

Yapo, A., & Weiss, J. (2018). Ethical implications of bias in machine learning. In: Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences; 3–6 January 2018; Hilton Waikoloa Village, Hawaii, USA. pp. 5365–5372. https://doi.org/10.24251/hicss.2018.668

Yu, X., Xu, S., & Ashton, M. (2022). Antecedents and outcomes of artificial intelligence adoption and application in the workplace: the socio-technical system theory perspective. Information Technology & People, 36(1), 454–474. https://doi.org/10.1108/itp-04-2021-0254

Zhou, K. Q., & Nabus, H. (2023). The Ethical Implications of DALL-E: Opportunities and Challenges. Mesopotamian Journal of Computer Science, 2023, 17–23. https://doi.org/10.58496/mjcsc/2023/003