Examining the impact of generative artificial intelligence on work dynamics
Abstract
The main purpose of this paper was to examine the impact of generative artificial intelligence (AI) on employee well-being and work dynamics. Using qualitative methodology, three semi-structured interviews were conducted to investigate the implications of generative AI on employee outcomes such as efficiency, job satisfaction, ethical considerations, and work-life balance. The findings highlighted the potential benefits and risks associated with generative AI implementation in the workplace. The study contributed to the literature by adopting a qualitative approach, allowing in-depth exploration of individual experiences with generative AI in the workplace. The study discussed the implications for employers, employees, and society.
Copyright (c) 2024 David Richard Lozie, Robina Omosa, Sara Hesami, Shenjuti Zaman, Mahsa Kajbaf, Amina Raza Malik
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2019). The wrong kind of AI? Artificial intelligence and the future of labor demand. Available online: https://doi.org/10.3386/w25682 (accessed on 25 April 2024).
Akerman, A., Gaarder, I., & Mogstad, M. (2015). The Skill Complementarity of Broadband Internet *. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130(4), 1781–1824. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjv028
Arslan, A., Cooper, C., Khan, Z., Golgeci, I., & Ali, I. (2021). Artificial intelligence and human workers interaction at team level: a conceptual assessment of the challenges and potential HRM strategies. International Journal of Manpower, 43(1), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijm-01-2021-0052
Ashraf, A. (2022). Why artificial intelligence requires human intervention. Available online: https://www.royalcyber.com/blogs/ai-systems-need-human-intervention/ (accessed on 25 April 2024).
Bailey J. (2023). From automation to reinvention: How AI is shifting the nature of work. Available online: https://www.vestigopartners.com/news/2023/4/5/from-automation-to-reinvention-how-ai-is-shifting-the-nature-of-work (accessed on 25 April 2024)
Bartel, A., Ichniowski, C., & Shaw, K. (2007). How Does Information Technology Affect Productivity? Plant-Level Comparisons of Product Innovation, Process Improvement, and Worker Skills. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(4), 1721–1758. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2007.122.4.1721
Bedard, J., Lavoie, K., Laverdiere, R, et. al. (2023). How generative AI will transform HR. Available online: https://www.bcg.com/publications/2023/transforming-human-resources-using-generative-ai (accessed on 25 April 2024).
Boden, M. A. (2016). AI: Its Nature and Future. Oxford University Press.
Brougham, D., & Haar, J. (2020). Technological disruption and employment: The influence on job insecurity and turnover intentions: A multi-country study. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 161, 120276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120276
Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies. W. W. Norton & Company.
Budhwar, P., Chowdhury, S., Wood, G., et al. (2023). Human resource management in the age of generative artificial intelligence: Perspectives and research directions on ChatGPT. Human Resource Management Journal, 33(3), 606–659. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12524
Collis, J., & Hussey, R. (2003). Business research: A practical guide for undergraduate and postgraduate students. Palgrave Macmillan.
Danaher, J., Hogan, M. J., Noone, C., et al. (2017). Algorithmic governance: Developing a research agenda through the power of collective intelligence. Big Data & Society, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717726554
Enholm, I. M., Papagiannidis, E., Mikalef, P., & Krogstie, J. (2021). Artificial Intelligence and Business Value: a Literature Review. Information Systems Frontiers, 24(5), 1709–1734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-021-10186-w
Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerization? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 254–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019
Glaser, B. G. (2002). Conceptualization: On Theory and Theorizing Using Grounded Theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690200100203
Goldstein, J. (2023). New IBM study reveals how AI is changing work and what HR leaders should do about it. Available online: https://www.ibm.com/blog/new-ibm-study-reveals-how-ai-is-changing-work-and-what-hr-leaders-should-do-about-it/ (accessed on 25 April 2024).
Holford, W. D. (2019). The future of human creative knowledge work within the digital economy. Futures, 105, 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2018.10.002
Hupfer S. (2020). Talent and workforce effects in the age of AI. Available online: https://resources.experfy.com/future-of-work/talent-and-workforce-effects-in-the-age-of-ai/ (accessed on 25 April 2024).
Kanodia, A. (2023). What is generative AI? Everything you need to know. Available online: https://www.webcluesinfotech.com/what-is-generative-ai-everything-you-need-to-know (accessed on 25 April 2024).
Kaur, M., & Gandolfi, F. (2023). Artificial intelligence in human resource management—Challenges and future research recommendations. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/372230471 (accessed on 25 April 2024).
Lenth, R. V. (2001). Some Practical Guidelines for Effective Sample Size Determination. The American Statistician, 55(3), 187–193. https://doi.org/10.1198/000313001317098149
Loring, E. (2018). How AI will help sales representatives. Available online: https://readwrite.com/2018/09/27/how-ai-will-help-sales-representatives/ (accessed on 25 April 2024).
Loten, A. (2017). AI to drive job growth by 2020: Gartner. Available online: https://blogs.wsj.com/cio/2017/12/15/ai-to-drive-job-growth-by-2020-gartner/ (accessed on 25 April 2024).
Marr, B. (2023). The top 10 limitations of ChatGPT. Available online: https://www.forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/2023/03/03/the-top-10-limitations-of-chatgpt/?sh=569e9d508f35 (accessed on 25 April 2024).
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. (2011). Designing Qualitative Research, 5th ed. SAGE Publications.
McKendrick, J. & Thurai, A. (2022). AI isn’t ready to make unsupervised decisions. Available online: https://hbr.org/2022/09/ai-isnt-ready-to-make-unsupervised-decisions (accessed on 25 April 2024).
Navarra, K. (2023). ChatGPT and HR: A primer for HR professionals. Available online: https://www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/hr-topics/technology/pages/chatgpt-hr-primer-ai-workplace.aspx (accessed on 25 April 2024).
Oganezi, B. U., Lozie, D. R. (2017). Employee retention strategy and performance of commercial banks in Ebonyi state, Nigeria. FUNAI Journal of Accounting, Business & Finance (Fujabf). 1(1), 279–287.
OpenAI. (2023). Research: GPT-4. Available online: https://openai.com/research/gpt-4 (accessed on 25 April 2024).
Pocket HRMS. (2023). Advantages of Google bard AI in HR. Available online: https://www.pockethrms.com/blog/google-bard-ai-in-hr/ (accessed on 25 April 2024).
Rampersad, G. (2020). Robot will take your job: Innovation for an era of artificial intelligence. Journal of Business Research, 116, 68–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.019
Rhomberg, C. (2022). Why hasn’t all this technology given us more leisure time? Available online: https://www.uipath.com/blog/digital-transformation/what-happened-four-hour-workw (accessed on 25 April 2024).
Sarfo, J. O., Gbordzoe, N. I., Debrah, T. P., et al. (2021). Qualitative research designs, sample size and saturation: is enough always enough? Journal of Advocacy, Research and Education, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.13187/jare.2021.3.60
Schmidt, P., Biessmann, F., & Teubner, T. (2020). Transparency and trust in artificial intelligence systems. Journal of Decision Systems, 29(4), 260–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2020.1819094
Schwab, K. (2017). The fourth industrial revolution, 1st ed. World Economic Forum.
Shetty, S. (2024). Determining sample size for qualitative research: What is the magical number? Available online: https://interq-research.com/determining-sample-size-for-qualitative-research-what-is-the-magical-number (accessed on 25 April 2024).
Shrinivaas K., Sudarmani, B., & Gopinathan, N. (2021). A study on the implementation of AI in an organization and its effects on employee morale. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry (TOJQI). 12(6): 5109–5112.
Somdip, D. (2023). Which ethical implications of generative ai should companies focus on? Available online: https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbestechcouncil/2023/10/17/which-ethical-implications-of-generative-ai-should-companies-focus-on/?sh=7cafe792239f (accessed on 25 April 2024).
Sommer, C. A., Ward, J. E., & Scofield, T. (2010). Metaphoric Stories in Supervision of Internship: A Qualitative Study. Journal of Counseling & Development, 88(4), 500–507. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6678.2010.tb00052.x
Stanford University. (2023). Generative AI: perspectives from Stanford HAI. Stanford University Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence. Available online: https://hai.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/2023- 03/Generative_AI_HAI_Perspectives.pdf (accessed on 25 April 2024).
van Manen, M. (1977). Linking Ways of Knowing with Ways of Being Practical. Curriculum Inquiry, 6(3), 205–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/03626784.1977.11075533
von Krogh, G., Roberson, Q., & Gruber, M. (2023). Recognizing and Utilizing Novel Research Opportunities with Artificial Intelligence. Academy of Management Journal, 66(2), 367–373. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2023.4002
Walsh, T., Levy, N., Bell, G., et al. (2019). The effective and ethical development of artificial intelligence. Available online: acola.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/hs4_artificial-intelligence-report.pdf (accessed on 25 April 2024).
Yadav, R., Chaudhary, N. S., Kumar, D., & Saini, D. (2022). Mediating and moderating variables of employee relations and sustainable organizations: a systematic literature review and future research agenda. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 31(7), 3023–3050. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoa-12-2021-3091
Yapo, A., & Weiss, J. (2018). Ethical implications of bias in machine learning. In: Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences; 3–6 January 2018; Hilton Waikoloa Village, Hawaii, USA. pp. 5365–5372. https://doi.org/10.24251/hicss.2018.668
Yu, X., Xu, S., & Ashton, M. (2022). Antecedents and outcomes of artificial intelligence adoption and application in the workplace: the socio-technical system theory perspective. Information Technology & People, 36(1), 454–474. https://doi.org/10.1108/itp-04-2021-0254
Zhou, K. Q., & Nabus, H. (2023). The Ethical Implications of DALL-E: Opportunities and Challenges. Mesopotamian Journal of Computer Science, 2023, 17–23. https://doi.org/10.58496/mjcsc/2023/003
