Paradigms of people management: Human resource strategies during an economic downturn
Abstract
Since the Industrial Revolution, there has been an evolution in the paradigms under which the industrial worker is perceived and dealt with. These paradigms can be briefly listed in the order of their evolutionary stage as: the food-gatherer, the economic man, the social man, the resourceful man, and the enterprising man. Each of them is a combination of two basic paradigms in different proportions, namely, the outsider paradigm and the partnership paradigm. Obviously, the paradigmatic perspectives of management about their workers will have a significant influence on how they treat their workers, which may become especially conspicuous during recessions and other kinds of hard times. It was in this context that we designed a study to understand the human resource strategies of companies during a period of recession. Data for this study was collected through the content analysis of 46 published cases, wherein we developed the ratings of two sets of variables, namely: the external and internal environments of the company and the strategic actions taken by the respective managements. A surprising finding of the study is that the correlations between the environmental factors and the strategy factors were small and non-significant; moreover, the correlations involving the external environment were smaller than those involving the internal environment. Hence, it may be inferred that strategic actions are influenced primarily by the paradigmatic perspectives of management rather than environmental factors. In order to identify the different types of paradigmatic perspectives, we have further carried out a cluster analysis to develop a taxonomy of paradigms. The results showed that there are five sub-paradigms, which are: (1) Pacifiers, constituting 35% of the sample; (2) Modifiers, constituting 22%; (3) Molders, constituting 17%; (4) Enhancers, constituting 15%; and (5) Exploiters, constituting 11%. The limitations of the study and the implications of the findings are discussed in the concluding part.
References
Argyris, C. & Schon, D. (1974). Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness. Jossey-Bass.
Argyris, C., & Schon, D. (1978). Organisational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Addison Wesley.
Argyris, C., Putnam, R., & McLain Smith, D. (1985). Action Science: Concepts, Methods, and Skills for Research and Intervention. Jossey-Bass.
Bhati, A., & Manimala, M. J. (2011). Talent acquisition and retention in social enterprises. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, 1(1), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.9770/jssi.2011.1.1(4)
Cadbury, E. (1914). Some Principles of Industrial Organisation. The Sociological Review, a7(2), 99–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954x.1914.tb02369.x
Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). The Empowerment Process: Integrating Theory and Practice. The Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 471. https://doi.org/10.2307/258093
Drucker, P. F. (1954). The Practice of Management. Harper & Row.
Gilbreth, F. B. (1912). Primer of Scientific Management. D Van Nostrand Company.
Gilbreth, F. B., Kent, R. T. (1921). Motion study: A Method for Increasing the Efficiency of the Workman. D Van Nostrand Company.
Gómez, C., & Rosen, B. (2001). The Leader-Member Exchange as a Link between Managerial Trust and Employee Empowerment. Group & Organization Management, 26(1), 53–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601101261004
Heider, F. (1958). The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. John Wiley & Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1037/10628-000
Herzberg, F., Mausner, B. & Snyderman, B. (1959). The Motivation to Work, 2nd ed. John Wiley.
Huselid, M. A. (1995). The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 635–672. https://doi.org/10.2307/256741
Kelley, H. H. (1971). Attribution in Social Interaction. General Learning Press.
Kelley, H. H. (1973). The processes of causal attribution. American Psychologist, 28(2), 107–128. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034225
Manimala, M. J. (1988). Case Survey Method in Entrepreneurship Research. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1944726
Manimala, M. J. (1992). Entrepreneurial heuristics: A comparison between high PL (pioneering-innovative) and low PI ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 7(6), 477–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(92)90021-i
Manimala, M. J. (1999). Entrepreneurial Policies and Strategies: The Innovator’s Choice. Sage.
Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and Personality. Harper & Row Publishers.
Mayo, E. (1945). Social Problems of an Industrial Civilization. Harvard University, Graduate School of Business Administration, Division of Research.
Mayo, E. (1933). The Human Problems of an Industrial Civilization. The Macmillan Company.
McGregor, D. (1960). The Human Side of Enterprise. McGraw-Hill.
Mohajan, H. (2019). The first industrial revolution: Creation of a new global human era. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 5(4): pp. 377–387.
Nicholson, N. (1998). How hardwired is human behavior? Harvard Business Review, 76(4), 134-147.
Roethlisberger, F. J., & Dickson, W. J. (1939). Management and the Worker. Harvard University Press.
Shepperd, J., Malone, W., & Sweeny, K. (2008). Exploring causes of the self-serving bias. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(2), 895–908. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00078.x
Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological, empowerment in the workplace: dimensions, measurement and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442–1465. https://doi.org/10.2307/256865
Spreitzer, G. M. (1996). Social structural characteristics of psychological empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 39(2), 483–504. https://doi.org/10.2307/256789
Taylor, F. W. (1911). The Principles of Scientific Management. Harper & Brothers Publishers.
Weber, M., Henderson A. M. (1947). In: Parsons, T. (translator). The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. Collier Macmillan Publishers.
Copyright (c) 2024 Mathew James Manimala, Clare Kurian
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to this journal agree to publish their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, allowing third parties to share their work (copy, distribute, transmit) and to adapt it, under the condition that the authors are given credit, and that in the event of reuse or distribution, the terms of this license are made clear. With this license, the authors hold the copyright without restrictions and are allowed to retain publishing rights without restrictions as long as this journal is the original publisher of the articles.
