Determining quality of hire, the holy grail of recruitment: A structuration perspective
Abstract
Purpose: This research paper aims to justify the need for the Quality of Hire (QOH) construct as a value-adding focus for strategic human resource management (SHRM). The traditional focus on efficiency and cost-oriented recruitment metrics overlooks the importance of QOH in providing a competitive advantage and delivering long-term value. The study expands the economic theory of human resource development and develops a profit-building concept relevant to SHRM by exploring the practices that enable QOH in organizations. Design: The study utilizes a case-study method to examine a target firm’s mechanisms to build QOH in its recruitment process. It applies a structuration theory lens to analyze the behavior of various actors, their agencies, and the continuous interplay between structure and action in enabling QOH. Findings: The findings suggest that assessing and building measures for getting QOH is a complex task for organizations due to the inherent reliance on lag measures such as performance and tenure. The study highlights that QOH can be enabled through changes in the firm’s recruitment practices. Originality: This paper contributes to recruitment research in two significant ways. First, it expands on the under-researched construct of QOH, providing clarity on its definition and importance. Second, it identifies lead practices that organizations can incorporate into their recruitment and selection processes to enable QOH. By using a structuration theory lens, the study explores how actors in the recruitment process adapt and align with new structural rules to enable QOH. Research implications: The research builds on the structuration theory in recruitment and selection and exhorts practitioners in organizations to move beyond efficiency-oriented recruitment practices and focus on practices that contribute to QOH. By considering post-hire outcomes, such as job performance and long-term retention, organizations can improve their talent acquisition and retention strategies, creating long-term value for the organizations.
References
1. Beechler S, Woodward IC. The global “war for talent”. Journal of International Management 2009; 15(3): 273–285. doi: 10.1016/j.intman.2009.01.002
2. Bower T. Reengineering the recruitment process. Available online: https://hbr.org/2021/03/reengineering-the-recruitment-process (accessed on 13 July 2023).
3. Yu KYT, Dineen BR, Allen DG, Klotz AC. Winning applicants and influencing job seekers: An introduction to the special issue on employer branding and talent acquisition. Human Resource Management 2022; 61(5): 515–524. doi: 10.1002/hrm.22140
4. Fuller J, Sigelman M. Manage your talent pipeline like a supply chain. Available online: https://hbr.org/2021/11/manage-your-talent-pipeline-like-a-supply-chain (accessed on 13 July 2023).
5. Tholen G. Matchmaking under uncertainty: How hiring criteria and requirements in professional work are co-created. Employee Relations 2023; 45(3): 603–614. doi: 10.1108/ER-06-2022-0262
6. Ulrich D, Dulebohn JH. Are we there yet? What’s next for HR? Human Resource Management Review 2015; 25(2): 188–204. doi: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2015.01.004
7. Makram H, Sparrow P, Greasley K. How do strategic actors think about the value of talent management? Moving from talent practice to the practice of talent. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance 2017; 4(4): 259–378. doi: 10.1108/JOEPP-06-2017-0051
8. Keller JR. Posting and slotting: How hiring processes shape the quality of hire and compensation in internal labor markets. Administrative Science Quarterly 2018; 63(4): 848–878. doi: 10.1177/0001839217736045
9. Breaugh JA. Predicting voluntary turnover from job applicant biodata and other applicant information. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 2014; 22(3): 321–332. doi: 10.1111/ijsa.12080
10. Engberg R, Hörte SÅ, Lundbäck M. Strategy implementation and organizational levels: Resourcing for innovation as a case. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance 2015; 2(2): 157–175. doi: 10.1108/JOEPP-03-2015-0007
11. Breaugh JA. Employee recruitment. Annual Review of Psychology 2013; 64: 389–416. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143757
12. van Mierlo J, Bondarouk T, Sanders K. The dynamic nature of HRM implementation: A structuration perspective. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 2018; 29(22): 3026–3045. doi: 10.1080/09585192.2018.1443957
13. Kravariti F, Oruh ES, Dibia C, et al. Weathering the storm: Talent management in internationally oriented Greek small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance 2021; 8(4): 444–463. doi: 10.1108/JOEPP-01-2021-0022
14. Stephan M, Erickson R. Talent acquisition: Enter the cognitive recruiter. 2017 global human capital trends. Available online: https://www2.deloitte.com/uk/en/insights/focus/human-capital-trends/2017/predictive-hiring-talent-acquisition.html (accessed on 13 July 2023).
15. Stubbings C, Sethi B. Upskilling: Building confidence in an uncertain world. Available online: https://www.pwc.com.au/digitalpulse/report-ceo-survey-upskilling.html (accessed on 13 July 2023).
16. Trusty J, Allen DG, Fabian F. Hunting while working: An expanded model of employed job search. Human Resource Management Review 2019; 29(1): 28–42. doi: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.12.001
17. Cunningham I, Nickson D. A gathering storm: Re‐tendering and the voluntary sector workforce. International Journal of Public Sector Management 2011; 24(7): 662–672. doi: 10.1108/09513551111172486
18. De Smet A, Dowling B, Mugayar-Baldocchi M, Schaninger B. ‘Great attrition’ or ‘great attraction’? The choice is yours. Available online: https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/people-and-organizational-performance/our-insights/great-attrition-or-great-attraction-the-choice-is-yours (accessed on 13 July 2023).
19. Lee TW, Hom P, Eberly M, Li J. Managing employee retention and turnover with 21st century ideas. Organizational Dynamics 2018; 47(2): 88–98. doi: 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2017.08.004
20. PwC. PwC pulse survey: Next in work. Available online: https://www.pwc.com/us/en/library/pulse-survey/future-of-work.html (accessed on 13 July 2023).
21. Barnett RC, Hall DT. How to use reduced hours to win the war for talent. Organizational Dynamics 2001; 29(3): 192–210.
22. Paschen J, Wilson M, Ferreira JJ. Collaborative intelligence: How human and artificial intelligence create value along the B2B sales funnel. Business Horizons 2020; 63(3): 403–414. doi: 10.1016/j.bushor.2020.01.003
23. Cross R, Opie T, Pryor G, Rollag K. Connect and adapt: How network development and transformation improve retention and engagement in employees’ first five years. Organizational Dynamics 2018; 47(2): 115–123. doi: 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2017.08.003
24. Tlaiss HA, Martin P, Hofaidhllaoui M. Talent retention: Evidence from a multi-national firm in France. Employee Relations 2017; 39(4): 426–445. doi: 10.1108/ER-07-2016-0130
25. Boon C, Biron M. Temporal issues in person–organization fit, person–job fit and turnover: The role of leader–member exchange. Human Relations 2016; 69(12): 2177–2200. doi: 10.1177/0018726716636945
26. Cascio WF, Aguinis H. 3 Staffing twenty‐first‐century organizations. The Academy of Management Annals 2008; 2(1): 133–165. doi: 10.1080/19416520802211461
27. Ko MC, Campbell JW. Social capital, person-organization fit and cynicism: A multi-stage mediation model of turnover intention in public organizations. Employee Relations 2021; 43(4): 936–954. doi: 10.1108/ER-05-2020-0237
28. Budhwar P, Malik A, De Silva MTT, Thevisuthan P. Artificial intelligence-challenges and opportunities for international HRM: A review and research agenda. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 2022; 33(6): 1065–1097. doi: 10.1080/09585192.2022.2035161
29. Fuller J, Raman M, Bailey A, Vaduganathan N. Rethinking the on-demand workforce. Available online: https://hbr.org/2020/11/rethinking-the-on-demand-workforce (accessed on 13 July 2023).
30. Mitchinson A, Morris R. Learning about learning agility. A White Paper. Centre for Creative Leadership; 2014.
31. Petriglieri J, Petriglieri G. The talent curse: Why high potentials struggle and how they can grow through it. Harvard Business Review 2017; 95(3): 88–95.
32. Abbot L, Batty R, Bevegni S. Global recruiting trends 2016—Relationships at the core. Available online: https://business.linkedin.com/content/dam/business/talent-solutions/global/en_us/c/pdfs/GRT16_GlobalRecruiting_100815.pdf (accessed on 13 July 2023).
33. Lermusiaux Y, Snell A. Quality of hire. Available online: https://www.nextaff.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/nextaff-white-paper-quality-hire.pdf (accessed on 13 July 2023).
34. Weldon D. Talent Acquisition Strategies: Employer Branding and Quality of Hire Take Center Stage. Aberdeen Group; 2008.
35. Ryan AM, Derous E. Highlighting tensions in recruitment and selection research and practice. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 2016; 24(1): 54–62. doi: 10.1111/ijsa.12129
36. Ulrich D. From war for talent to victory through organization. Strategic HR Review 2015; 14(1/2): 8–12. doi: 10.1108/SHR-01-2015-0004
37. Campion MC, Campion ED, Campion MA. Using practice employment tests to improve recruitment and personnel selection outcomes for organizations and job seekers. Journal of Applied Psychology 2019; 104(9): 1089–1102. doi: 10.1037/apl0000401
38. Giddens A. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. University of California Press; 1985.
39. Yin RK. The Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 2nd ed. SAGE Publications; 1994.
40. Flyvbjerg B. Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry 2006; 12(2): 219–245. doi: 10.1177/1077800405284363
41. Zucker DM. How to do case study research. Teaching Research Methods in the Social Sciences 2009; 2.
42. Eisenhardt KM, Graebner ME. Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal 2007; 50(1): 25–32. doi: 10.5465/amj.2007.24160888
43. Francis JJ, Johnston M, Robertson C, et al. What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies. Psychology and Health 2010; 25(10): 1229–1245. doi: 10.1080/08870440903194015
44. Winby S, Worley CG. Management processes for agility, speed, and innovation. Organizational Dynamics 2014; 43(3): 225–234. doi: 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2014.08.009
Copyright (c) 2023 Debolina Dutta, Chaitali Vedak
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
