Incentive policies for retention of physicians in the private health sector in Portugal
Abstract
The high demand for quality healthcare services in Portugal is generating concerns about meeting the optimum number of healthcare professionals in the private sector, such as doctors and clinicians. Critical interventions are currently in progress, aiming to provide quality healthcare that will be accessible and sustainable through actionable retention strategies such as investing and developing human capital, introducing better conditions of service to attract and retain talent in the private healthcare sector, and prioritizing the needs of patients. The objective of this study is to understand which factors promote the migration of physicians from the public to the private sector according to the theoretical assumptions of incentives. In this context, a phenomenological study was carried out, using semi-structured interviews with fifteen physicians working in the private health network. Content analysis was done using NVivo 12. The results indicate that performance evaluation in the private sector exists but has no alignment with incentives. The condition makes the private healthcare sector unattractive, however, other policies of remuneration remain promising. Current proposals that could revive the image of the sector include collective decision-making and strong labour relations advocacy for physicians in the private sector.
References
1. Ministry of Health (MH). Annual report: Access to healthcare in NHS facilities and contracted entities. Available online: https://www.acss.min-saude.pt/2021/09/22/nhss-annual-healthcare-access-report-presents-the-2020-results/ (accessed on 26 June 2023).
2. Bank of Portugal. Central balance sheet analysis of private healthcare companies (Portuguese). Available online: https://bpstat.bportugal.pt/conteudos/publicacoes/1350 (accessed on 26 June 2023).
3. Mateus A, Ramalho E, Oliveira, H, et al. Private health sector in Portugal. Available online: https://www.ffms.pt/sites/default/files/2022-07/Estudo-Sector_Privado_da_Sa%C3%BAde_em_Portugal.pdf (accessed on 26 June 2023).
4. Portugal. Establishes the terms and conditions for the granting of incentives for geographical mobility to areas in need of medical workers with an indefinite employment contract (Portuguese). Available online: https://dre.pt/web/guest/legislacao-consolidada/-/lc/105826975/202010201741/diploma?p_p_state=maximized&did=105821479&rp=indice (accessed on 26 June 2023).
5. Portugal. Approves the Basic Law on Health and revokes Law no. 48/90, of August 24, and Decree Law no. 185/2002, of August 20 (Portuguese). Available online: https://dre.pt/home/-/dre/124417108/details/maximized (accessed on 26 June 2023).
6. Asadi-Aliabadi M, Karimi SM, Mirbaha-Hashemi F, et al. Motivating non-physician health workers to reduce the behavioral risk factors of non-communicable diseases in the community: A field trial study. Archives of Public Health 2023; 81(1): 37(2023). doi: 10.1186/s13690-023-01047-w
7. Marques I, Serrasqueiro Z, Nogueira F. Managers’ competences in private hospitals for investment decisions during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability 2021; 13(4): 1757. doi: 10.3390/su13041757
8. Pozza DH, Azevedo LF, Castro Lopes JM. Pain as the fifth vital sign—A comparison between public and private healthcare systems. PLoS ONE 2021; 16(11): e0259535. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259535E
9. Simões JA, Augusto GF, Fronteira I, Hernandez-Quevedo C. Portugal: Health system review. Health Systems in Transition 2017; 19(2): 1–184.
10. Dahiyat E, El-Dahiyat F, El Refae G, Babar Z. Exploring the factors impacting physicians’ attitudes toward health information exchange with patients in Jordanian hospitals. Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice 2023; 16(1): 7. doi: 10.1186/s40545-023-00514-6
11. Habicht T, Kasekamp K, Webb E. 30 years of primary health care reforms in Estonia: The role of financial incentives to achieve a multidisciplinary primary health care system. Health Policy 2023; 130: 104710. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2023.104710
12. Nunes AM, Ferreira DC. Reforms in the Portuguese health care sector: Challenges and proposals. The International Journal of Health Planning and Management 2018; 34(1): e21–e33. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2695
13. De Mesa RYH, Marfori JRA, Fabian NMC, et al. Experiences from the Philippine grassroots: Impact of strengthening primary care systems on health worker satisfaction and intention to stay. BMC Health Services Research 2023; 23(1): 117. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08799-1
14. Filc D, Rasooly A, Davidovitch N. From public vs. private to public/private mix in healthcare: Lessons from the Israeli and the Spanish cases. Israel Journal of Health Policy Research 2020; 9(1): 31. doi: 10.1186/s13584-020-00391-4
15. Rocha JA. Human Resource Management in Public Administration, 3rd ed. Escolar Editora; 2010.
16. Knapik J. People and Talent Management, 3rd ed. InterSaberes; 2012.
17. Kreps DM. Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives. The American Economic Review 1997; 87(2): 359–364.
18. Ferreira M, Lopes A, Guimarães M, Barros H. The medical career and the key factors driving the exodus of doctors from the national health service Portugal. Acta Médica Portuguesa 2018; 31(9). doi: 10.20344/amp.10121
19. ACSS. Medical career. Available online: https://www.acss.min-saude.pt/profissionais-da-cplp/ (accessed on 26 June 2023).
20. Rudmik L, Wranik D, Rudisill-Michaelsen C. Physician payment methods: A focus on quality and cost control. Journal of Otolaryngology—Head & Neck Surgery 2014; 43(1): 34–38.
21. Kuvaas B. The relative efficiency of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. In: Sasson A (editor). At the Forefront, Looking Ahead. Universitetsforlaget; 2018. pp. 198–213.
22. Buchan J. Still attractive after all these years? Magnet hospitals in a changing health care environment. Journal of Advanced Nursing 1999; 30(1): 100–108. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1999.01054.x
23. Hopkins V. Institutions, incentives, and policy entrepreneurship. Policy Studies Journal 2016; 44(3): 332–348. doi: 10.1111/psj.12132
24. OECD. Portugal: Country Health Profile 2021. OECD Publishing; 2021.
25. Lagarde M, Blaauw D. Physicians’ responses to financial and social incentives: A medically framed real effort experiment. Social Science & Medicine 2017; 179: 147–159. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.03.002
26. Eiche C, Birkholz T, Konrad F, et al. Job satisfaction and performance orientation of paramedics in German emergency medical services—A nationwide survey. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2021; 18(23): 12459. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312459
27. Hadley J, Reschovsky JD. Medicare fees and physicians’ medicare service volume: Beneficiaries treated and services per beneficiary. International Journal of Health Care Finance and Economics 2006; 6(2): 131–150. doi: 10.1007/s10754-006- 8143-z
28. Pratt MK. How to attract provider talent to your practice. Medical Economics Journal 2020; 97(3): 20–23.
29. Ormel H, Kok M, Kane S, et al. Salaried and voluntary community health workers: Exploring how incentives and expectation gaps influence motivation. Human Resources for Health 2019; 17(1): 59. doi: 10.1186/s12960-019-0387-z
30. Fernandes RB, Martins BS, Caixeta RP, et al. Quality of work life: An evaluation of Walton model with analysis of structural equations. Espacios 2017; 38(3): 5.
31. Britton J, French E. Health and employment amongst older workers. Fiscal Studies 2020; 41(1): 221–250. doi: 10.1111/1475-5890.12213
32. Zhao X, Tan F, Liu W, Li Q. The impact of the policy of free medical services on the population in Ambon of Indonesia. In: Proceedings of 2021 International Conference on Public Health and Data Science (ICPHDS); 9–11 July 2021; Chengdu, China.
33. Milcent C, Zbiri S. Supplementary private health insurance: The impact of physician financial incentives on medical practice. Health Economics (United Kingdom) 2022; 31(1): 57–72.
34. Luz Saúde. Report and accounts 2019. Available online: https://www.luzsaude.pt/pt/investidores/informacao-financeira/relatorio-e-contas (accessed on 26 June 2023).
35. Lusíadas Saúde. Lusíadas knowledge center. Available online: https://www.lusiadas.pt/lusiadas/lusiadas-
36. knowledge-center(accessed on 26 June 2023).
37. Stone PW. Value-based incentive programs and health disparities. JAMA Network Open 2020; 3(7): e2010231. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.10231
38. Reid RO, Kommareddi M, Paddock SM, Damberg CL. Does removing financial incentives lead to declines in performance? A controlled interrupted time series analysis of Medicare Advantage Star Ratings programme performance. BMJ Quality & Safety 2021; 30(2): 167–172. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010253
39. Sura A, Shah NR. Pay-for-performance initiatives: Modest benefits for improving healthcare quality. Am Heal Drug Benefits 2010; 3(2): 135–142.
40. Davies P. QOF. British Journal of General Practice 2007; 57(543): 836.
41. Pandya A, Doran T, Zhu J, et al. Modelling the cost-effectiveness of pay-for-performance in primary care in the UK. BMC Medicine 2018; 16(1): 135(2018). doi: 10.1186/s12916-018-1126-3
42. Laurent F, Sicsic J, Saint-Lary O. Contract for improving professional practices: What is the impact perceived by GPs? (French). Revue d’Épidémiologie et de Santé Publique 2015; 63(2): 67–76. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2015.01.071
43. Mushagalusa CR, Mayeri DG, Kasongo B, et al. Profile of health care workers in a context of instability: A cross-sectional study of four rural health zones in eastern DR Congo (lessons learned). Human Resources for Health 2023; 21(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12960-023-00816-6
44. Bardin L. The Content Analysis. PUF; 1977.
45. Braun V, Clarke V. Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health 2019; 11(4): 589–597. doi: 10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
46. Sylim PG, Lu JL, Marcelo PGF. Discoursing terminology standards and interoperability in relation to the Philippine eHealth strategy. Acta Medica Philippina 2022; 56(1): 106–117. doi: 10.47895/amp.v56i1.3937
47. Esteves M, Abelha A, Machado J. The development of a pervasive Web application to alert patients based on business intelligence clinical indicators: A case study in a health institution. Wireless Networks 2019; 28: 1279–1285. doi: 10.1007/s11276-018-01911-6
48. Gosden T, Forland F, Kristiansen IS, et al. Impact of payment method on behaviour of primary care physicians: A systematic review. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy 2001; 6(1): 44–55. doi: 10.1258/1355819011927198
49. Eisapareh K, Nazari M, Kaveh MH, Ghahremani L. The relationship between job stress and health literacy with the quality of work life among Iranian industrial workers: The moderating role of social support. Current Psychology 2020; 41: 2677–2685. doi: 10.1007/s12144-020-00782-5
Copyright (c) 2023 Isabel Cristina Panziera Marques, Fernanda Nogueira, João Amorim, Adalberto Campos Fernandes
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
