Discuss how the Mogao Cave 275 was the product of Silk Road Cultural Interaction.

  • Shujin Li SOAS University of London
Article ID: 3571
11 Views, 9 PDF Downloads
Keywords: Dunhuang; Mogao Caves; Mogao Cave 275; Silk Roads; China; India; Central Asia; Persia; Cultural Interaction; Multiculturalism; Maitreya Buddha; Buddhism; Art History; Iconography; Northern Liang Dynasty

Abstract

This study examines Mogao Cave 275 in Dunhuang, constructed during China’s Northern Liang Dynasty (397–495 CE), as a prime example of cultural exchange along the Silk Road. The cave’s location in a fragile mountainous area dictated the use of murals, statues, and distinctive architectural styles, reflecting diverse influences from Central Asia, India, and Persia. Through an analysis of the Maitreya Buddha statue, its posture, and iconography, the paper highlights parallels with Gandharan and Xinjiang art, while also tracing Chinese architectural features in the Que-style niches. Additionally, donor portraits in ethnic attire capture Silk Road communities’ cultural diversity and intermingling. By focusing on these elements, the study reveals Mogao Cave 275 as a symbol of Silk Road multiculturalism, integrating religious and artistic traditions across Eurasia.

References

[1] Buck, Elaine. The “Buddhism under Imperial patronage”, China and Silk Road: Art and Archaeology (15PARH057-A23/24), Class

Lecture at the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS), Unversity of London, London, UK, Duration: 01:28:23, 29th January 2024.

[2]Dunhuang Academy. “Mogao Cave 275 (Northern Liang Dynasty).” Accessed on 28th April 2024.

[3] Fan, Jin shi. The Caves of Dunhuang. Hong Kong: Dunhuang Academy in collaboration with London Editions, 2010.

[4]Li, Tian.“Zhong-guo Gu-dai Qu-xing Jian-zhu Dui Mo-gao Ku Que-xing-kan De Ying-xiang”(China ancient Que-shaped building

effect of Mogao Grottoes Que-shaped niches in Dunhuang), Zhong-guo Jian-cai Ke-ji(The architectural material and technology in China)

26, No.1(2017): 94-95.

[5]Liu, Xiafei, “Ke-zi-er Shi-ku Shen-sheng Kong-jian De Gong-jian – Yi Di 38 Ku Wei Li”(The making of sacred space in Kizil Cave

Complexes, in the case studies of Kizil Cave 38), Zhong-guo-hua Hua-kan(Journal of Chinese Painting), No.1(2024): 62-67.

[6]Yaldiz, Marianne. “Maitreya in Literature and in the art of Xinjiang” in Kizil on the Silk Road: Crossroads of the Commerce &

Meeting of Minds, edited by Rajeshwari Ghose and National Centre for the Performing Arts (India), 66-83. Mumbai: Murag Publication on

the behalf of National Centre for the Performing Arts, 2008.

[7]Zhang Shanqing, “He-xi Shi-ku Kan-xing-kan Su-yuan Chu-yi”(The discussion of the origin of Kan-shaped niches in He-xi cave

shrines). Kao-gu Yu Wen-wu (The archaeology and antiques), No.03(2012):67-73.

Published
2024-11-20
How to Cite
Li, S. (2024). Discuss how the Mogao Cave 275 was the product of Silk Road Cultural Interaction. Learning & Education, 13(3). Retrieved from https://ojs.piscomed.com/index.php/L-E/article/view/3571
Section
Article