Social Wealth Structure of the Ming Dynasty and its Influence on the Historical Development of China

  • Zeming Zhao School of History and Ethnic Culture of Guizhou University
Article ID: 2693
141 Views, 131 PDF Downloads
Keywords: Ming Dynasty, Wealth distribution, Wealth structure

Abstract

After the middle of the Ming Dynasty, with the rapid development of market commodity economy, Jiangnan town economy and silver monetization, the social production and life relations had undergone profound changes, and the polarization of social wealth became more and more serious.A hundred years and seriously solidified centralized system and party struggle and corrupt bureaucracy promoted this unfair distribution, intensified social conflicts, and eventually led to the demise of the Ming Dynasty.The article divides the social groups of the Ming Dynasty into different classes, analyzes the composition of its wealth structure, and discusses the influence of this structure on the historical development of China.

References

[1] Jinxing ye, Guan Hanhui, Li Daokui, et al.Evolution of China's relative position in the world economy (AD 1000-2017 AD): Amendment to Madison estimates [J].Economic research, 2019,54 (7): 14-29.

[2] He Bingdi.In the early Ming Dynasty, population reduction and its related problems: 1368-1953 [M].Beijing: Life · Reading · Xinzhi Sanlian Bookstore, 2000.

[3] Wanming ".Summary of the International Symposium on Silver in Chinese History " [J].Chinese coins, 2017 (3): 76-79.

[4] Lin Wenxun. The formation and historical status of "enriching the people society" in ancient China [J]. Research on China's economic history, 2006 (2): 31-38.

[5] Ma Lie, Li Jun. gain with work or gain without work: a survey of income distribution of different groups in the middle of Kangxi in the Qing Dynasty [J]. Research on Chinese social and economic history, 2020 (1): 21-35.

Published
2022-03-13
How to Cite
Zhao, Z. (2022). Social Wealth Structure of the Ming Dynasty and its Influence on the Historical Development of China. Learning & Education, 10(5), 111-112. https://doi.org/10.18282/l-e.v10i5.2693