Comparison of TOEFL iBT and ESOL in Reliability
Abstract
TOEFL iBT and ESOL are two language proficiency tests, and they are widely accepted by test takers worldwide. Both tests assess test takers’ speaking skills, but they vary to some extent. This study will compare these two tests in terms of reliability criteria.References
[1] Alderson, J. C., et al. (1995). Language test construction and evaluation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[2] Bachman, L. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[3] Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing in practice: Designing and developing useful language tests (Vol. 1). Oxford University Press.
[4] Brown, A. (2003). Interviewer variation and the co-construction of speaking proficiency. Language testing, 20(1), 1-25.
[5] Clark, H. H. (1979). Responding to indirect speech acts. Cognitive psychology, 11(4), 430-477.Ets TOEFL (n.d.) Retrieved March 20, 2020, from https://www.ets.org/toefl/ibt/about/content/Ets Org (n.d.)Retrieved March 20, 2020, from https://www.ets.org/
[6] Gamaroff, R., (2000). Rater reliability in language assessment: the bug of all bears. System, 28(1), pp.31–53.
[7] Hughes, A., (2003). Testing for language teachers Second., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
[8] Lee, J. (2014). U.S. Patent No. 8,763,098. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
[9] Luoma, S., (2004). Assessing speaking, Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press.
[10] Newton, P., & Shaw, S. (2014). Validity in educational and psychological assessment. Sage.
[11] Norton, J. (2005). The paired format in the Cambridge Speaking Tests. ELT journal, 59(4), 287-297.
[12] Orr, M. (2002). The FCE speaking test: Using rater reports to help interpret test scores. System, 30(2), 143-154.
[13] O’Sullivan, B. (2002). Learner acquaintanceship and oral proficiency test pair-task performance. Language Testing, 19(3), 277-295.
[14] Shohamy, E., (1983). THE STABILITY OF ORAL PROFICIENCY ASSESSMENT ON THE ORAL INTERVIEW TESTING PROCEDURES. Language Learning, 33(4), pp.527–540.
Authors contributing to this journal agree to publish their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International License, allowing third parties to share their work (copy, distribute, transmit) and to adapt it, under the condition that the authors are given credit, that the work is not used for commercial purposes, and that in the event of reuse or distribution, the terms of this license are made clear. With this license, the authors hold the copyright without restrictions and are allowed to retain publishing rights without restrictions as long as this journal is the original publisher of the articles.
