Clinical effect of combined anterior and posterior approach surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy

  • Yanzhou Jiang People’s Hospital of Hanting District, Weifang, Shandong, China. 261100
  • Lianchong Fu People’s Hospital of Hanting District, Weifang, Shandong, China. 261100
  • Yushan Yushan People’s Hospital of Hanting District, Weifang, Shandong, China. 261100
Keywords: Anterior and posterior surgery combined therapy, Spinal cord type of cervical spondylosis, Clinical efficacy, Spinal nerve function

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of combined anterior and posterior approach surgery for patients with spinal type. Methods: 96 patients with cervical spondylosis were randomly selected among all patients admitted in our hospital from January 2013 to December 2015. They were evenly assigned to A, B or C group, 32 patients each.  Patients in Group A suffered from cervical myelopathy and were treated by combined anterior and posterior approach. Patients in Group B group suffered from cervical vertebra disease and accepted a cervical corpectomy decompression and a bone graft fusion internal fixation surgery. Patients in Group C accepted conventional posterior decompression and fusion surgery for lateral mass screw fixation. Postoperative follow-up, X-ray intervertebral stability and fusion, neurological function JOA score and clinical efficacy of the effective date were compared. Results: JOA scores of all three groups were improved after 6 months. After a year, patients in Group A, B and C scored (16.3 ± 1.83), (15.7 ± 1.15) and (15.59 ± 1.21), respectively. The pairwise score differences between any two groups were statistically significant (P < 0.05). After one year’s follow-up, the bone graft and internal fixation material had no signs of loosening, displacement or subsidence. The fusion rates of Group A, B and C reached 90.6%, 53.1% and 56.25%, respectively. Similarly, the pairwise differences in fusion rate between any two groups were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The clinical effectiveness was classified as apparent, effective, fair and invalid. The effective rates of Group A, B and C were 87.5%, 50% and 56.2%, respectively. The pairwise differences between any two groups were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Combined anterior and posterior approach surgery significantly improved the clinical efficacy than the other two surgeries.

References

Zhang Yilong, Zhou Feifei, Sun Yu. Changes of JOA scores in the near and midterm after surgical treatment of cervical spondylosis myelopathy[J]. Chinese Journal of spinal cord, 2015, 25(1): 13-17.

Cui Mingyu. Comparative study on the therapeutic effects of different surgical approaches for cervical spondylosis myelopathy[J]. China Medical Herald, 2012, 09(1): 32-34.

Yang Bo, Fan Li, Huang Jing. Anterior and posterior combined surgery for the treatment of anterior and posterior spinal cord compression[J]. Armed police medicine, 2012, 23, (2): 105-107.

Published
2019-03-30
Section
Original Research Article