Construction and Logic Research of Chinese Marxist Theoretical Innovation Paradigm
Abstract
With the rapid development of economic globalization and political democratization, the relationship between globalization and the country has become the core issue of the debate in the process of economic globalization and political democratization. As far as the study of Marxist state theory is concerned, how to grasp the relationship between Marxist state theory and the current era has become a new proposition in the study of Marxist state theory in the new century. The purpose of this article is to explore the construction and logical research of the Chinese Marxist theoretical innovation paradigm. This article summarizes and analyzes the achievements and shortcomings of the innovation and transformation of contemporary Marxist state theory paradigm. Promoting the research on the history of the Communist Party of China and the development history of Marxism based on the perspective of paradigm construction and exploring the theoretical innovation paradigm based on the perspective of the history of the Communist Party of China and the development history of Marxism will all be a new research horizon. The history of the Communist Party of China and the history of the development of Marxism in China have a historical and logical relationship. This article analyzes the motivation, basis and principles of the transformation of Marxist state theory paradigm, as well as the value orientation, basic category and specific path selection of the publicity research paradigm of Marxist state theory. Investigation and research show that more than 50% of students believe that the role of Marxist innovation paradigm theory education is still great, and it plays a key role in the ideological and political work of colleges and universities and the comprehensive quality education of students.References
[1] Gao Wei, Hao Linyu. Educational Metaphors and Theoretical Innovation: Studies on Metaphors of Educational Thoughts of YE Lan[J]. Elementary Education, 2019, 016(001): 5-14, 62.
[2] Zhang. Research on the Influence of Accounting Environmental Change on Financial Accounting Theoretical Innovation[J]. ADV SOC, EDUC HUM, 2015, 2015, 12(1): 509-511.
[3] Ferretti M, Panetti E, Parmentola A, et al. The port community system as a local innovation system: A theoretical framework[J]. MERCATI E COMPETITIVIT, 2017, 2017/1(1): 97-118.
[4] Callaghan C W. The probabilistic innovation theoretical framework[J]. South African Journal of Economic and Management ences, 2017, 20(1): 10-10.
[5] Mu Yu, Xu Ming. Study on the Relationship of Product Innovativeness and Innovation Performance——A Literature Review and Theoretical Model from the Perspective of Firms[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2018, 035(007): 153-160.
[6] Chouinard V, Fincher R. A Critique of “Structural Marxism and Human Geography”[J]. Annals of the Association
of American Geographers, 2015, 73(1):137-150.
[7] Newman, L. The Greening of Marxism[J]. Interdiplinary Studies in Literature & Environment, 2015, 81(2): 139-140.
Authors contributing to this journal agree to publish their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International License, allowing third parties to share their work (copy, distribute, transmit) and to adapt it, under the condition that the authors are given credit, that the work is not used for commercial purposes, and that in the event of reuse or distribution, the terms of this license are made clear. With this license, the authors hold the copyright without restrictions and are allowed to retain publishing rights without restrictions as long as this journal is the original publisher of the articles.
