Comment mener une recherche interventionnelle en psycho-oncologie ? Développement, évaluation et implémentation en pratique clinique
Interventional Studies in Psycho-Oncology: Development, Evaluation, and Implementation in Clinical Practice
Article ID:
3941
5 Views
Abstract
This article discusses the methods used to develop, evaluate, and implement new psycho-oncology interventions in clinical practice. In this regard, two world-widely used models are presented to provide scientific insight to the different actors involved in the research. Interventional research concerns clinicians, researchers, institutional actors, and patients to develop new projects using methodological rigor and to improve the conditions of patients and relatives.
Résumé
Cet article a pour objectif de décrire les méthodes pouvant être utilisées pour développer, évaluer et implé- menter en pratique clinique de nouvelles interventions en psycho-oncologie. Pour cela, deux modèles de référence à l’international sont présentés afin d’apporter un éclairage scientifique aux différents acteurs impliqués dans ces recherches. Ce travail concerne cliniciens, chercheurs, acteurs institutionnels et patients ; cela afin de développer de nouveaux projets utilisant une rigueur méthodologique et d’intérêt pour améliorer les conditions des patients et des proches.
References
1. Gorman LM (2018) The psychosocial impact of cancer on the individual, family, and society. In: Bush NJ, Gorman LM (eds) Psychosocial nursing care along the cancer continuum (3rd ed).
Oncology Nursing Society, Pittsburgh, pp 3–23
2. Zabora J, BrintzenhofeSzoc K, Curbow B, et al (2001) The prevalence of psychological distress by cancer site. Psychooncology 10:19–28
3. Hawe P, Potvin L (2009) What Is Population Health Intervention Research? Can J Public Health 100:I8–I14
4. Ninot G, Boulze-Launay I, Bourrel G, et al (2018) De la définition des interventions non médicamenteuses (INM) à leur ontologie. Hegel 8:21–27
5. Non-Pharmacological Intervention Society. Définition des INM. Available at: https://npisociety.org
6. Alla F, Kivits J (2015). La recherche interventionnelle en santé publique : partenariat chercheurs–acteurs, interdisciplinarité et rôle social. Santé Publique 27:303–4
7. Institute of Population and Public Health, Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Mapping and tapping the wellsprings of health. Strategic Plan 2002–2007. CIHR, Ottawa
8. Rose G (1992) The strategy of preventive medicine. Oxford University Press, Oxford
9. Salsman JM, McLouth LE, Cohn M, et al (2020) A web-based, positive emotion skills intervention for enhancing post-treatment psychological well-being in young adult cancer survivors (EMPOWER): protocol for a single-arm feasibility trial. JMIR Res Protoc 9:e17078
10. Boinon D, Chales C, Fasse L, et al (2021). Feasibility of a videobased cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia in French adult cancer outpatients: results from the Sleep-4-all-1 study. Support Care Cancer 29:5883–94
11. Clarke A, Paraskeva N, White P, et al (2020). PEGASUS: the design of an intervention to facilitate shared decision-making in breast reconstruction. J Cancer Educ 36:508–18
12. ter Stege JA, Woerdeman LAE, Hahn DEE, et al (2019) The impact of an online patient decision aid for women with breast cancer considering immediate breast reconstruction: study protocol
of a multicenter randomized controlled trial. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 19:165.
13. Porter LS, Keefe FJ (2018) Couple-based communication interventions for cancer: moving beyond a “one size fits all” approach. Acta Oncol 57:693–695
14. Jonsdottir JI, Jonsdottir H, Klinke ME (2018) A systematic review of characteristics of couple-based intervention studies addressing sexuality following cancer. J Adv Nurs 74:760–73
15. Ogez D, Péloquin K, Bertout L, et al (2019) Psychosocial intervention programs for parents of children with cancer: a systematic review and critical comparison of programs’ models and development. J Clin Psychol Med Settings 26:550–74
16. Gehenne L, Christophe V, Eveno C, et al (2021) Creating scripted video-vignettes in an experimental study on two empathic processes in oncology: Reflections on our experience. Patient Educ Couns 104:654–62
17. Aramideh J, Ogez D, Mizrahi T, et al (2020). Do professionals change their communication behaviours following a training in hypnosis-derived communication? A feasibility study in pediatric oncology. Complement Ther Med 52:102426
18. Ogez D, Aramideh J, Mizrahi T, et al (2020). Does practicing hypnosis-derived communication techniques by oncology nurses translate into reduced pain and distress in their patients? An exploratory study. Br J Pain 15:147–54
19. Carbonnel F, Ninot G (2019) Identifying frameworks for validation and monitoring of consensual behavioral intervention technologies: narrative review. J Med Internet Res 21:e13606
20. Czajkowski SA, Powell LH, Adler N, et al (2015) From ideas to efficacy: the ORBIT model for developing behavioral treatments for chronic diseases. Health Psychol 34:971–82
21. Skivington K, Matthews L, Simpson SA, et al (2021) Framework for the development and evaluation of complex interventions: gap analysis, workshop and consultation-informed update. Health Technol Assess 25:1–132
22. US Food & Drug administration (2018). The drug development process. Available at: https://www.fda.gov/patients/learn-aboutdrug-and-device-approvals/drug-development-process
23. Medical Research Council. What we do. Available at: https://mrc. ukri.org/about/what-we-do/
24. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, et al (2008) Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 337:979–983
25. Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, et al (2015). Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 350:h1258
26. Borelli B (2011) The assessment, monitoring, and enhancement of treatment fidelity in public health clinical trials. J Public Health Dent 71:S52–S63
27. Loi no 2012-300 du 5 mars 2012 relative aux recherches impliquant la personne humaine (1) (JO 6 mars 2012)
28. Di Ruggiero E, Potivn L, Allegrante JP, et al (20) Ottawa Statement from the Sparking Solutions Summit on Population Health Intervention Research. Can J Public Health 107:e492–e496
29. Ninot G, Carbonnel F (2016) Pour un modèle consensuel de validation clinique et de surveillance des interventions non médicamenteuses (INM). Hegel 6:1–7
Oncology Nursing Society, Pittsburgh, pp 3–23
2. Zabora J, BrintzenhofeSzoc K, Curbow B, et al (2001) The prevalence of psychological distress by cancer site. Psychooncology 10:19–28
3. Hawe P, Potvin L (2009) What Is Population Health Intervention Research? Can J Public Health 100:I8–I14
4. Ninot G, Boulze-Launay I, Bourrel G, et al (2018) De la définition des interventions non médicamenteuses (INM) à leur ontologie. Hegel 8:21–27
5. Non-Pharmacological Intervention Society. Définition des INM. Available at: https://npisociety.org
6. Alla F, Kivits J (2015). La recherche interventionnelle en santé publique : partenariat chercheurs–acteurs, interdisciplinarité et rôle social. Santé Publique 27:303–4
7. Institute of Population and Public Health, Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Mapping and tapping the wellsprings of health. Strategic Plan 2002–2007. CIHR, Ottawa
8. Rose G (1992) The strategy of preventive medicine. Oxford University Press, Oxford
9. Salsman JM, McLouth LE, Cohn M, et al (2020) A web-based, positive emotion skills intervention for enhancing post-treatment psychological well-being in young adult cancer survivors (EMPOWER): protocol for a single-arm feasibility trial. JMIR Res Protoc 9:e17078
10. Boinon D, Chales C, Fasse L, et al (2021). Feasibility of a videobased cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia in French adult cancer outpatients: results from the Sleep-4-all-1 study. Support Care Cancer 29:5883–94
11. Clarke A, Paraskeva N, White P, et al (2020). PEGASUS: the design of an intervention to facilitate shared decision-making in breast reconstruction. J Cancer Educ 36:508–18
12. ter Stege JA, Woerdeman LAE, Hahn DEE, et al (2019) The impact of an online patient decision aid for women with breast cancer considering immediate breast reconstruction: study protocol
of a multicenter randomized controlled trial. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 19:165.
13. Porter LS, Keefe FJ (2018) Couple-based communication interventions for cancer: moving beyond a “one size fits all” approach. Acta Oncol 57:693–695
14. Jonsdottir JI, Jonsdottir H, Klinke ME (2018) A systematic review of characteristics of couple-based intervention studies addressing sexuality following cancer. J Adv Nurs 74:760–73
15. Ogez D, Péloquin K, Bertout L, et al (2019) Psychosocial intervention programs for parents of children with cancer: a systematic review and critical comparison of programs’ models and development. J Clin Psychol Med Settings 26:550–74
16. Gehenne L, Christophe V, Eveno C, et al (2021) Creating scripted video-vignettes in an experimental study on two empathic processes in oncology: Reflections on our experience. Patient Educ Couns 104:654–62
17. Aramideh J, Ogez D, Mizrahi T, et al (2020). Do professionals change their communication behaviours following a training in hypnosis-derived communication? A feasibility study in pediatric oncology. Complement Ther Med 52:102426
18. Ogez D, Aramideh J, Mizrahi T, et al (2020). Does practicing hypnosis-derived communication techniques by oncology nurses translate into reduced pain and distress in their patients? An exploratory study. Br J Pain 15:147–54
19. Carbonnel F, Ninot G (2019) Identifying frameworks for validation and monitoring of consensual behavioral intervention technologies: narrative review. J Med Internet Res 21:e13606
20. Czajkowski SA, Powell LH, Adler N, et al (2015) From ideas to efficacy: the ORBIT model for developing behavioral treatments for chronic diseases. Health Psychol 34:971–82
21. Skivington K, Matthews L, Simpson SA, et al (2021) Framework for the development and evaluation of complex interventions: gap analysis, workshop and consultation-informed update. Health Technol Assess 25:1–132
22. US Food & Drug administration (2018). The drug development process. Available at: https://www.fda.gov/patients/learn-aboutdrug-and-device-approvals/drug-development-process
23. Medical Research Council. What we do. Available at: https://mrc. ukri.org/about/what-we-do/
24. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, et al (2008) Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 337:979–983
25. Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, et al (2015). Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 350:h1258
26. Borelli B (2011) The assessment, monitoring, and enhancement of treatment fidelity in public health clinical trials. J Public Health Dent 71:S52–S63
27. Loi no 2012-300 du 5 mars 2012 relative aux recherches impliquant la personne humaine (1) (JO 6 mars 2012)
28. Di Ruggiero E, Potivn L, Allegrante JP, et al (20) Ottawa Statement from the Sparking Solutions Summit on Population Health Intervention Research. Can J Public Health 107:e492–e496
29. Ninot G, Carbonnel F (2016) Pour un modèle consensuel de validation clinique et de surveillance des interventions non médicamenteuses (INM). Hegel 6:1–7
Published
2022-03-30
How to Cite
Lamore, K., & Ogez, D. (2022). Comment mener une recherche interventionnelle en psycho-oncologie ? Développement, évaluation et implémentation en pratique clinique. Psycho-Oncologie, 16(1). Retrieved from https://ojs.piscomed.com/index.php/PO/article/view/3941
Issue
Section
Article
Copyright (c) 2022 The author(s).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
