A qualitative research on the symptom experience and psychological feelings of patients during the rehabilitation period after radical hysterectomy
Abstract
Objective: This study seeks to probe the symptom experiences and psychological feelings of patients during the rehabilitation period following radical hysterectomy through qualitative research and structured interviews, providing a reference basis for rehabilitation interventions. Methods: A total of 200 patients who underwent radical hysterectomy were selected as the study subjects. In the study of postoperative rehabilitation interventions for cervical cancer, a detailed interview outline was first formulated, covering a wide range of topics from physical symptoms to psychological feelings. In-depth interviews and recordings were conducted with patients to ensure the comprehensiveness and accuracy of the information. Strict quality control measures were taken during the interview process, including pre-determined quiet interview environments to ensure smooth patient expression and the avoidance of leading language. The interview content was not limited to verbal expression but also focused on patients’ body language and emotional changes, providing researchers with adequate data sources. After the interviews, data accuracy and completeness were ensured through text conversion and voice confirmation. In the final interview analysis stage, detailed analysis results were compiled, including themes, patterns, and key trends, providing in-depth understanding and guidance for further research and interventions. Subsequently, patient interviews and result summaries were conducted. Results: Among the 200 individuals, (1) physical symptoms encompassed fatigue (22.50%), urination disorders (24.00%), and lower limb dysfunction (25.00%); (2) Psychological issues included a sense of stigma (40.50%), financial concerns (50.50%), and fear of recurrence (35.50%).; (3) Family-associated changes involved emotional changes with husbands (61.00%) and immediate family members (65.00%); (4) Social aspects included a decreased sense of social identity (76.00%) and impaired social interaction (63.00%). Conclusion: Following radical hysterectomy, patients during the rehabilitation period face adverse experiences pertaining to symptom experience and psychological feelings, which necessitates appropriate interventions to boost their recovery.
Copyright (c) 2025 Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Corsini C, Bergengren O, Carlsson S, et al. Patient-reported Side Effects 1 Year After Radical Prostatectomy or Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer: A Register-based Nationwide Study. European Urology Oncology. 2024; 7(3): 605–613. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.12.007
Nowroozi A, Abbasi B, Amini E, et al. Effect of treatment modality on quality of life among patients with urinary bladder cancer. International Journal of Urological Nursing. 2021; 16(2): 147–156. doi: 10.1111/ijun.12308
Keles A, Kose M, Somun UF, et al. Impact of health and digital health literacy on quality of life following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: prospective single-center cohort study. World Journal of Urology. 2024; 42(1). doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-04960-z
Mahjoubi MF, Ben-Latifa M, Karoui Y, et al. Radical Versus Conservative Methods in One-Stage Pilonidal Abscess Surgery: The Experience of A Tunisian Center. ABCD Brazilian Archives of Digestive Surgery (São Paulo). 2022; 35. doi: 10.1590/0102-672020220002e1713
Marinkovic M, Djordjevic N, Djordjevic L, et al. Assessment of the quality of life in breast cancer depending on the surgical treatment. Supportive Care in Cancer. 2020; 29(6): 3257–3266. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05838-7
Yiannopoulou KG, Anastasiou AI, Kontoangelos K, et al. Cognitive and Psychological Impacts of Different Treatment Options for Prostate Cancer: A Critical Analysis. Current Urology. 2020; 14(4): 169–177. doi: 10.1159/000499242
Sun L, Fan X, Shen C, et al. Effect of psychological intervention combined with family model on postoperative rehabilitation in patients with cervical cancer. Minerva Medica. 2022; 113(3). doi: 10.23736/s0026-4806.20.07176-1
Fox L, Wiseman T, Cahill D, et al. Effect of a brief physical activity-based presentation by a former patient for men treated with radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: a mixed methods pilot study. Supportive Care in Cancer. 2020; 29(1): 145–154. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05455-4
Akasaka M, Yoshida K, Maezawa T, et al. Observation of Child Development in a Uterine Cervical Cancer Patient Who Received Chemotherapy during Pregnancy. Gan to Kagaku ryoho. Cancer Chemother. 2021; 48(8): 1069–1071.
Geese F, Willener R, Spichiger E. Patients’ and partners’ experiences with prostate cancer and advanced practice nurse counselling. International Journal of Urological Nursing. 2021; 15(2): 82–90. doi: 10.1111/ijun.12270
Millet N, McDermott HJ, Moss EL, et al. Increasing physical activity levels following treatment for cervical cancer: an intervention mapping approach. Journal of Cancer Survivorship. 2021; 16(3): 650–658. doi: 10.1007/s11764-021-01058-y
Cao J, Peng C, Lu X, et al. Factors influencing the degree of participation in surgical decision-making among Chinese patients with prostate cancer: A qualitative research. Asian Journal of Urology. 2022; 9(2): 177–185. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2021.08.003
Lai Y, Lin A, Zheng Z, et al. Perceptions of pelvic floor dysfunction and rehabilitation care amongst women in southeast China after radical hysterectomy: a qualitative study. BMC Women’s Health. 2022; 22(1). doi: 10.1186/s12905-022-01687-0
Borghmans F. The radical and requisite openness of viable systems: Implications for healthcare strategy and practice. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 2021; 28(2): 324–331. doi: 10.1111/jep.13576
Xu Y, Yang J. The effect of 5A nursing combined with psychological nursing on the immune function, cancer-related fatigue and complications of patients undergoing radical resection of colorectal cancer. Cellular and Molecular Biology. 2022; 68(1): 169–176. doi: 10.14715/cmb/2022.68.1.21
van de Graaf DL, Mols F, Trompetter HR, et al. Effectiveness of the online Acceptance and Commitment Therapy intervention “Embrace Pain” for cancer survivors with chronic painful chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2022; 23(1). doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06592-3
P A, G R. A rare case of a patient with primary urothelial carcinoma of the prostate urethra - Multidisciplinary approach. Urology Case Reports. 2021; 38: 101643. doi: 10.1016/j.eucr.2021.101643
Banerjee S, Semper K, Skarparis K, et al. Patient perspectives of vigorous intensity aerobic interval exercise prehabilitation prior to radical cystectomy: a qualitative focus group study. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2019; 43(8): 1084–1091. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1651907
Khalilullah SA, Tranggono U, Hendri AZ, et al. Comparing the outcome of ileal conduit and transuretero-cutaneostomy urinary diversion after radical cystectomy: a retrospective cohort study. African Journal of Urology. 2021; 27(1). doi: 10.1186/s12301-021-00163-9
Arch JJ, Mitchell JL, Schmiege SJ, et al. A randomized controlled trial of a multi-modal palliative care intervention to promote advance care planning and psychological well-being among adults with advanced cancer: study protocol. BMC Palliative Care. 2022; 21(1). doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-01087-z
Smith AJB, Jones TN, Miao D, et al. Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 2021; 28(3): 544–555. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.12.023
Liu L, Yu C, Sun F, et al. Can preoperative ureteral stents reduce the incidence of ureteral stricture after radiotherapy in patients with cervical cancer? BMC Urology. 2022; 22(1). doi: 10.1186/s12894-022-01029-0
Liu B, Qiu ML, Luo RG, et al. The efficacy and safety analysis of cervical and abdominal double single-port minimally invasive esophagectomy. Chinese Medical Journal. 2023; 103(23): 1767–1773.
Kunitomo A, Ouchi A, Komori K, et al. Clinical Impact of Radical Resection of Synchronous and Metachronous Peritoneal Metastases from Colorectal Cancer. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 2023; 30(13): 8501–8508. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-14191-y
Madden K, Vosper J, Evangeli M, et al. Understanding the Relationship Between Sexual Assault and Cervical Screening Uptake. European Journal of Health Psychology. 2022; 29(4): 196–206. doi: 10.1027/2512-8442/a000109
Minamitani M, Katano A, Mukai T, et al. Comparative analysis of treatment decision-making in patients with localized prostate and cervical cancer: what influences receiving surgery or radiotherapy? Supportive Care in Cancer. 2024; 32(6). doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08589-x
