The influence of surface imperfections on phosphate coating performance of nodular cast iron substrates

Ariticle ID: 3343
115 Views, 57 PDF Downloads
Keywords: Spheroidal Cast Iron, Material Characterization, Phosphate Coating, Wheel Hub Assembly, General Corrosion, Microstructure, SEM-EDS, Accelerate Corrosion Salt Spray

Abstract

The service performance of the nodular cast iron wheel hub was modelled by investigating the effect of surface morphology and characteristics on the phosphate coating size, morphology, and corrosion resistance properties of the zinc phosphate conversion coated cast iron substrates. The machined and unmachined surfaces as well as the coatings were examined by a scanning electron microscope coupled with an energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometer (SEM-EXD). The influence of the substrates’ surface imperfections on the phosphate coating and the subsequent corrosion resistance was assessed and rated according to the standard procedures. Surface analysis of the machined and unmachined cast iron hubs reveals the existence of graphite and foreign material inclusions on the substrate surface that impact the phosphate coating properties and resistance to corrosion. The average phosphate coating crystal size is 1.74 µm and 2.58 µm for the unmachined and machined cast iron substrates, respectively. The corrosion resistance of the coated unmachined wheel hub surfaces was rated poor and disapproved based on the application requirements. The poor corrosion resistance was ascribed to the influence of the substrates’ surface characteristics on the coating adhesion to the substrate. However, the cast surfaces should be properly shot-blasted to remove any adhere foreign materials on the as-cast skin to enhance the coating adhesion.

Author Biography

Samuel A. Awe, Research and Development Department, Automotive Components Floby
Research Manager

References

Gaal A. What is the role of your car’s hub assembly? Available online: https://www.euroautomotive.net/what-is-the-role-of-your-cars-hub-assembly/ (accessed on 10 July 2023).

Pan S, Zeng F, Su N, Xian Z. The effect of niobium addition on the microstructure and properties of cast iron used in the cylinder head. Journal of Materials Research and Technology 2020; 9(2): 1509–1518. doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.11.076

Collignon M, Regheere G, Cristol AL, et al. Braking performance and influence of microstructure of advanced cast irons for heavy goods vehicle brake discs. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part J: Journal of Engineering Tribology 2013; 227(8): 930–940. doi: 10.1177/1350650113484212

Awe SA. Developing material requirements for automotive brake discs. Modern Concepts in Material Science–MCMS 2019; 2(2). doi: 10.33552/MCMS.2020.02.000531

Aranke O, Algenaid W, Awe S, Joshi S. Coatings for automotive grey cast iron brake discs: A review. Coatings 2019; 9(9): 552. doi: 10.3390/coatings9090552

Mahade S, Awe SA, Björklund S, et al. Sliding wear behavior of a sustainable Fe-based coating and its damage mechanisms. Wear 2022; 500–501: 204375. doi: 10.1016/j.wear.2022.204375

Stefanescu DM. Classification and basic metallurgy of cast irons. In: ASM Specialty Handbook Cast Irons. ASM International; 1990. p. 12.

De Sousa JAG, Sales WF, Machado AR. A review on the machining of cast irons. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2018; 94: 4073–4092. doi: 10.1007/s00170-017-1140-1

Chikali PB, Shinde VD. Analysis of machinability in ductile iron casting. Materials Today: Proceedings 2019; 27(1): 584–588. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.12.064

Daeth J, Robbins M, Reuter U, et al. The effect of metallurgical variables on the machinability of compacted graphite iron. SAE Technical Paper Series 2001-01-0409; 2001. doi: 10.4271/2001-01-0409

Nejneru C, Burduhos-Nergis DP, Axinte M, et al. Analysis of the physical-mechanical properties of the Zinc Phosphate Layer deposited on a nodular cast iron substrate. Coatings 2022; 12(10): 1384. doi: 10.3390/coatings12101384

Akafuah N, Poozesh S, Salaimeh A, et al. Evolution of the automotive body coating process—A review. Coatings 2016; 6(2). doi: 10.3390/coatings6020024

Doerre M, Hibbitts L, Patrick G, Akafuah NK. Advances in automotive conversion coatings during pretreatment of the body structure: A review. Coatings 2018; 8(11). doi. 10.3390/coatings8110405

Ogle K, Tomandl A, Meddahi N, Wolpers M. The alkaline stability of phosphate coatings I: ICP atomic emission spectroelectrochemistry. Corrosion Science 2004; 46(4): 979–995. doi: 10.1016/S0010-938X(03)00182–3

Karlsson J. Corrosion Mechanisms under Organic Coatings. A Study in Relation to Next Generation’s Pretreatments [Master’s thesis]. Chalmers University of Technology; 2011.

Standard practice for operating salt spray (fog) apparatus. ASTM; 2019. Available online: https://www.astm.org/b0117-19.html (accessed on 10 July 2023).

Paints and varnishes—Evaluation of degradation of coatings—Designation of quantity and size of defects, and intensity of uniform changes in appearance—Part 3: Assessment of degree of rusting. ISO; 2016. Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/66400.html (accessed on 10 July 2023).

Standard test method for evaluation of painted or coated specimens subjected to corrosive environments. ASTM; 2017. Available online: https://www.astm.org/d1654-08r16e01.html (accessed on 10 July 2023).

Yasuda HK, Reddy CM, Yu QS, et al. Effect of scribing modes on corrosion test results. Corrosion 2001; 57(1): 29–34. doi: 10.5006/1.3290326

Published
2023-08-21
How to Cite
Awe, S. A. (2023). The influence of surface imperfections on phosphate coating performance of nodular cast iron substrates. Materials Physics and Chemistry, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.18282/mpc.v5i1.3343
Section
Article