Did the Pupil Premium Policy work and how other countries learn from it – A systematic review

  • Yufei Liu University of Durham
Article ID: 4468
6 Views
Keywords: Pupil Premium Policy; Policy Evaluation; Systematic Review; Free School Male; Academic Attainment; Social Segregation

Abstract

The UK government adopted the Pupil Premium Policy in 2011. It is a focused funding program designed to overcome disparities in educational opportunities. It gives schools more money in order to support students from underprivileged backgrounds.The goal of this policy is to reduce the achievement gap between these pupils receiving Free School Meals and their more affluent counterparts. After more than a decade, a comprehensive assessment of this program is necessary to comprehend its efficacy, obstacles, and future directions. With the articles as support, this essay will concentrate on the Pupil Premium Policy’s implementation, results, and issues.But this policy is getting mixed reviews. Many commentors argued that the funding that the Pupil Premium Policy provide to schools are not been used to its best effect. On the other hand, many scholars and researchers found that the implementation of the Pupil Premium Policy have a positive impact on close the poverty attainment gap between the disadvantage students and others.

Published
2025-04-30
How to Cite
Liu, Y. (2025). Did the Pupil Premium Policy work and how other countries learn from it – A systematic review. Lifelong Education, 14(1). Retrieved from https://ojs.piscomed.com/index.php/LE/article/view/4468
Section
Review

References

[1]Gorard, S., & Siddiqui, N. (2019). How trajectories of disadvantage help explain school attainment. Sage Open, 9(1),

2158244018825171.

[2]Gorard, S. (2015). A proposal for judging the trustworthiness of research findings. researchED magazine.

[3]Gorard, S. (2016). A cautionary note on measuring the pupil premium attainment gap in England. British Journal of Education, Society & Behavioural Science, 14(2), 1-8.

[4]Gorard, S., Siddiqui, N., & See, B. H. (2021). The difficulties of judging what difference the Pupil Premium has made to school intakes and outcomes in England. Research Papers in Education, 36(3), 355-379.

[5]Gorard, S. (2022). What is the evidence on the impact of Pupil Premium funding on school intakes and attainment by age 16 in England?. British Educational Research Journal, 48(3), 446-468.

[6]Gorard, S., Siddiqui, N., & See, B. H. (2022). Assessing the impact of Pupil Premium funding on primary school segregation and

attainment. Research Papers in Education, 37(6), 992-1019.

[7]Gorard, S. (2023). Segregation and the attainment gap for permanently disadvantaged pupils in England. Educational review, 75(6),

1039-1062.

[8]Lupton, R., & Thomson, S. (2015). Socio-economic inequalities in English schooling under the Coalition Government 2010–15.

London Review of Education, 13(2), 4-20.

[9]Jenkins, B. C. (2020). The impact of Pupil Premium on the attainment gap in Wales: An investigation into the policy’s effect on the

achievement of disadvantaged students and their peers.

[10]Craske, J. (2018). ‘You can’t show impact with a new pair of shoes’: negotiating disadvantage through Pupil Premium. Journal of

Education Policy, 33(4), 526-557.

[11]Gazeley, L. (2022). Problematising flagship ‘disadvantage’policies in English schools: Agenda setting and incoherence in the absence of an over-arching theory of change. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 1-22.