Family and school support and physical activity behaviour in childhood cancer survivors: A meta-analytic review from a social ecological perspective
Abstract
Physical activity is increasingly recognised as an important component of survivorship care for childhood cancer survivors, yet participation levels often remain low following treatment. Social ecological frameworks suggest that family, peer, and school environments may influence physical activity behaviour; however, quantitative synthesis of this evidence remains limited. This study aimed to systematically review and meta-analytically synthesise available quantitative evidence on the association between family, parental, peer, and school-related support and physical activity behaviour among childhood cancer survivors. A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Observational and interventional studies examining social support contexts in relation to physical activity outcomes among survivors aged ≤21 years were eligible for inclusion. Quantitative synthesis was restricted to methodologically comparable association-based studies. Pearson correlation coefficients and odds ratios were extracted or derived and synthesised using random-effects models. Methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Three observational studies met the criteria for quantitative synthesis. Two studies examining family or parental support reported positive associations with moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), yielding a pooled correlation coefficient of r = 0.42 (95% CI 0.11–0.65). One large cross-sectional study further demonstrated that higher parental support was associated with a greater likelihood of MVPA participation (OR = 0.92, 95% CI 0.88–0.96). Overall methodological quality was rated as moderate, with limitations primarily related to cross-sectional study designs and residual confounding. These findings indicate that family and parental support are positively associated with physical activity behaviour among childhood cancer survivors; however, the limited number of studies and observational nature of the evidence preclude causal inference. Future longitudinal and intervention studies that explicitly integrate family- and peer-based support mechanisms are needed to inform socially grounded physical activity promotion strategies in survivorship care.
Copyright (c) 2026 Mengjin Yao, Weiya Sun

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
1. Petersen NN, Larsen HB, Pouplier A, et al. Childhood cancer survivors’ and their parents’ experiences with participation in a physical and social intervention during cancer treatment: A RESPECT study. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2022; 78(11): 3806–3816. doi: 10.1111/jan.15381
2. Doshi K, Kazak AE, DeRosa BW, et al. Measuring health-related beliefs of mothers of adolescent and young adult childhood cancer survivors. Families, Systems, & Health. 2011; 29(1): 55–63. doi: 10.1037/a0022198
3. Kim Y, Park S. Feasibility and benefits of a combined programme of exercise and play for paediatric cancer survivors: A pilot study. European Journal of Cancer Care. 2019; 28(5). doi: 10.1111/ecc.13111
4. Cox CL, Montgomery M, Oeffinger KC, et al. Promoting physical activity in childhood cancer survivors. Cancer. 2009; 115(3): 642–654. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24043
5. Winzig J, Inhestern L, Sigmund D, et al. And what about today? Burden and support needs of adolescent childhood cancer survivors in long‐term follow‐up care—A qualitative content analysis. Child: Care, Health and Development. 2023; 50(1): e13207. doi: 10.1111/cch.13207
6. Kim JY, Yoo S, Yeon SJ, et al. Physical activity levels, exercise preferences, and exercise barriers in children and adolescents after cancer treatment. 2022; 30(2): 1787–1796. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-520789/v1
7. Alderfer MA, Cnaan A, Annunziato RA, et al. Patterns of posttraumatic stress symptoms in parents of childhood cancer survivors. Journal of Family Psychology. 2005; 19(3): 430–440. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.19.3.430
8. Paxton RJ, Jones LW, Rosoff PM, et al. Associations between leisure‐time physical activity and health‐related quality of life among adolescent and adult survivors of childhood cancers. Psychooncology. 2010; 19(9): 997–1003. doi: 10.1002/pon.1654
9. Rueegg CS, von der Weid NX, Rebholz CE, et al. Daily physical activities and sports in adult survivors of childhood cancer and healthy controls: a population-based questionnaire survey. PLoS ONE. 2012; 7(4): e34930. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034930
10. Utami KCU, Devi NLPS, Puspita LM. The use of CERIA E-module to enhance parents’ knowledge and family support practice among childhood cancer survivors undergoing chemotherapy. Babali Nursing Research. 2024; 5(1): 90–98. doi: 10.37363/bnr.2024.51331
11. Soejima T, Sato I, Takita J, et al. Do childhood cancer and physical late effects increase worries about future employment in adulthood? Cancer Reports. 2019; 2(3): e1175. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.1175
12. Hoffman MC, Mulrooney DA, Steinberger J, et al. Deficits in Physical Function Among Young Childhood Cancer Survivors. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2013; 31(22): 2799–805. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.47.8081
13. Ha L, Wakefield CE, Fardell J, et al. Parent perceptions of their child’s and their own physical activity after treatment for childhood cancer. Supportive Care in Cancer. 2022; 30(11): 8947–8957. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07288-9
14. Wilson CL, Stratton K, Leisenring WL, et al. Decline in physical activity level in the childhood cancer survivor study cohort. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention. 2014; 23(8): 1619–1627. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-14-0213
15. Armstrong GT, Kawashima T, Leisenring W, et al. Aging and risk of severe, disabling, life-threatening, and fatal events in the childhood cancer survivor study. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2014; 32(12): 1218–1227. doi: 10.1200/jco.2013.51.1055
16. Ness KK, Leisenring WM, Huang S, et al. Predictors of inactive lifestyle among adult survivors of childhood cancer. Cancer. 2009; 115(9): 1984–1994. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24209
17. Stolley MR, Restrepo J, Sharp LK. Diet and physical activity in childhood cancer survivors: A review of the literature. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2010; 39(3): 232–249. doi: 10.1007/s12160-010-9192-6
18. Qian, H. (2026). Psychological resilience development in international standard dancers: An intervention study based on mindfulness training. Mindfulness. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-025-02725-2
19. Gilliam MB, Madan‐Swain A, Whelan K, et al. Cognitive influences as mediators of family and peer support for pediatric cancer survivors’ physical activity. Psycho-Oncology. 2012; 22(6): 1361–1368. doi: 10.1002/pon.3140
20. Ramsey WA, Heidelberg RE, Gilbert AM, et al. eHealth and mHealth interventions in pediatric cancer: A systematic review of interventions across the cancer continuum. Psycho-Oncology. 2019; 29(1): 17–37. doi: 10.1002/pon.5280
21. Brinkman TM, Recklitis CJ, Michel G, et al. Psychological symptoms, social outcomes, socioeconomic attainment, and health behaviors among survivors of childhood cancer: Current state of the literature. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2018; 36(21): 2190–2197. doi: 10.1200/jco.2017.76.5552
22. Zhang A, Zebrack B, Acquati C, et al. Technology-assisted psychosocial interventions for childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology. 2022; 11(1): 6–16. doi: 10.1089/jayao.2021.0012
23. Berg C, Neufeld P, Harvey J, et al. Late Effects of childhood cancer, participation, and quality of life of adolescents. OTJR: Occupational Therapy Journal of Research. 2008; 29(3): 116–124. doi: 10.3928/15394492-20090611-04
24. Gilliam MB, Madan-Swain A, Whelan K, et al. Social, demographic, and medical influences on physical activity in child and adolescent cancer survivors. Journal of Pediatric Psychology. 2011; 37(2): 198–208. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsr085
25. Xu F, Jin X, Chen Y, et al. Associated factors on physical activity among childhood cancer survivors in Mainland China: a qualitative exploration applied health belief model. Supportive Care in Cancer. 2022; 30(11): 9221–9232. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07324-8
