A sociological perspective on the improvement of social isolation in cancer patients by musical vocal activities
Abstract
Based on a sociological perspective, this study employed a randomized controlled trial to recruit 120 cancer patients, who were allocated to an experimental group and a control group. The experimental group received a 12-week music-vocal activity intervention in addition to routine rehabilitation care, while the control group received routine care only. Six outcome indicators were assessed: social isolation, perceived social support, frequency of social activities, vocal self-efficacy, quality of life in the social functioning dimension, and group cohesion. Results showed that all indicators in the experimental group improved significantly compared with baseline and with the control group (P < 0.001), with the greatest improvements observed at 12 weeks. Intention-to-treat analyses with multiple imputation for missing data confirmed the robustness of the findings. The study demonstrates that systematic music and vocal activities can effectively reduce social isolation, enhance perceived social support, promote social participation, and improve both quality of life and group cohesion by strengthening patients’ self-efficacy and group identity. These results provide a promising pathway for social reconstruction during cancer rehabilitation.
Copyright (c) 2026 Shengnan Dai

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
1. Arani AZ, Ramezani T. Predicting psychological well-being based on attitudes toward aging and social support mediated by hope in life. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment. 2025; 35(7): 1153–1167. doi: 10.1080/10911359.2024.2395397
2. Tabi KJ, Topacio R, Paguta SAL, et al. Does work-based social support matter? A perspective on Gen Z hospitality interns. Education + Training. 2025; 67(5–6): 684–699. doi: 10.1108/et-07-2024-0334
3. Zhang R, Song Y, Li X, et al. The Reciprocal Relationship Between Perceived Social Support and Compulsive Internet Use: A Daily Diary Study. Basic and Applied Social Psychology. 2025; 47(5): 328–338. doi: 10.1080/01973533.2025.2527109
4. Wei X, Liu Y, Wang H, et al. Preliminary study on SIRI dynamic changes for the efficacy prediction and prognosis evaluation of advanced cancer patients treated with immunotherapy. Discover Oncology. 2025; 16(1). doi: 10.1007/s12672-025-03521-z
5. Mohamad N, Rajendiran S, Khairul Hasni NA, et al. Feasibility of acquiring occupational data from cancer patients’ medical records in Malaysian oncology centres. BMC Public Health. 2025; 25(1). doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-24284-w
6. Mun JY, Han K, Yoo N, et al. Overall survival following radical surgery and postoperative chemotherapy in colorectal cancer patients aged ≥ 70 years: a population-based retrospective cohort study. BMC Cancer. 2025; 25(1). doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14863-w
7. Jabonski VE, Triquez LS, Norbah GPA, et al. Breast cancer patients present pro-tumor biomarkers related to purinergic signaling and oxidative stress. Purinergic Signalling. 2025; 1–15. doi: 10.1007/s11302-025-10110-w
8. Opito R, Lacika JL, Wabinga H, et al. Symptom attributions by cervical cancer patients attending specialized care at the Uganda cancer institute: a cross-sectional study. Cancer Causes & Control. 2025; 36(12): 1785–1794. doi: 10.1007/s10552-025-02062-8
9. Lee E kyung. Effect of Cooperative Music Activities on Empathy Ability, Emotional Expressiveness and Social Intelligence. Korean Society of Children’s Literature and Education. 2019; 20(1): 399–425. doi: 10.22154/jcle.20.1.17
10. Yuan R, Qi F, Zhou J, et al. The impact of reading trauma literature on Chinese undergraduates’ PTSD: the mediating roles of social support and empathy. BMC Psychology. 2025; 13(1). doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-03356-x
11. Moen M, Storm K, Young D, et al. Establishing a research advisory committee in addictions services with a focus on social needs and social isolation. Research Involvement and Engagement. 2025; 11(1). doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00770-8
12. Wulkau L, Racaite J, Bain P, et al. Forced Displacement, Social Support, and Resilience: Meta-analytic Evidence. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health. 2025; 1–33 doi: 10.1007/s10903-025-01759-x
13. Oropallo A. Social isolation in wound healing requires a tapestry of care. Nursing. 2025; 55(9): 37–38. doi: 10.1097/nsg.0000000000000245
14. Kaur KB, Sophie J, Caitlin B, et al. A systematic review of change in symptoms, well-being and quality of life with group singing in people with cancer and their caregivers. Supportive Care in Cancer. 2024; 32(4): 246–246. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08449-8
15. Buller DB, Sussman AL, Thomson CA, et al. #4Corners4Health Social Media Cancer Prevention Campaign for Emerging Adults: Protocol for a Randomized Stepped-Wedge Trial. JMIR Research Protocols. 2024; 13: e50392. doi: 10.2196/50392
16. Fillon M. The social media cancer misinformation conundrum. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2021; 72(1): 3–4. doi: 10.3322/caac.21710
17. Sun MY, Eul GY, SungRae C, et al. Does Etiology Matter? Comparative Analysis of a Singing-Enhanced Swallowing Protocol for Patients with Neurological Impairment versus Head and Neck Cancer. Brain Sciences. 2021; 11(8): 997–997. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11080997
18. Seongmoon J, Sun MY, YoonKyum S, et al. Therapeutic singing as a swallowing intervention in head and neck cancer patients with dysphagia. Integrative Cancer Therapies. 2021; 20: 15347354211065040. doi: 10.1177/15347354211065040
19. Wilson E. Social work, cancer survivorship and liminality: meeting the needs of young women diagnosed with early stage breast cancer. Journal of Social Work Practice. 2019; 34(1): 95–111. doi: 10.1080/02650533.2019.1604497
20. Lepard T, Dugan M, Cleveland E, et al. Clinical genetic counselors' use of people- and identity-first language in regard to patients' identification with disability. Journal of Genetic Counseling. 2025; 34(2). doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1972
21. Warran K, Fancourt D, Perkins R. The experience and perceived impact of group singing for men living with cancer: A phenomenological study. Psychology of Music. 2019; 47(6): 874–889. doi: 10.1177/0305735619854526
22. Jo S, Yeo MS, Shin YK, et al. Effect of therapeutic singing on swallowing function of patients with head and neck cancer. IBRO Reports. 2019; 6: S165–S166. doi: 10.1016/j.ibror.2019.07.522
23. Fancourt D, Warran K, Finn S, et al. Psychosocial singing interventions for the mental health and well-being of family carers of patients with cancer: results from a longitudinal controlled study. BMJ Open. 2019; 9(8): e026995. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026995
24. Warran K, Fancourt D, Wiseman T. How does the process of group singing impact on people affected by cancer? A grounded theory study. BMJ Open. 2019; 9(1): e023261. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023261
25. Paulo CB, Eng L, Mitchell L, et al. What information and features do young and older adults with cancer want in their hospital-based social media cancer resource? Annals of Oncology. 2018; 29: viii630. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy300.086
26. Axelrod R, Pienta KJ. Cancer as a Social Dysfunction—Why Cancer Research Needs New Thinking. Molecular Cancer Research. 2018; 16(9): 1346–1347. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.mcr-18-0013
27. Clements-Cortés A. Singing and Vocal Interventions in Palliative and Cancer Care: Music Therapists’ Perceptions of Usage. Journal of Music Therapy. 2017; 54(3): 336–361. doi: 10.1093/jmt/thx010
28. Reagon C, Gale N, Dow R, et al. Choir singing and health status in people affected by cancer. European Journal of Cancer Care. 2016; 26(5): e12568. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12568
29. Mary DR, C. AS, Jeffrey L, et al. What do social media-savvy cancer survivors tell us about the completeness of survivorship care plans? Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2017; 35(15): 10063-10063.
30. Lamkin DM, Lutgendorf SK, Lubaroff D, et al. Cancer induces inflammation and depressive-like behavior in the mouse: Modulation by social housing. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity. 2011; 25(3): 555–564. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2010.12.010
31. Dobata S, Sasaki T, Mori H, et al. Persistence of the single lineage of transmissible ‘social cancer’ in an asexual ant. Molecular Ecology. 2010; 20(3): 441–455. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294x.2010.04954.xf
