A Critical Evaluation of Bureaucratic Approach Towards Managing Contemporary Organisations
Abstract
Supporters stress the importance of bureaucracy in modern organizations, whereas opponents assert its useless. This article will discuss both the advantages and disadvantages of Bureaucracy and critically evaluates the management approach by using real examples to give business a deeper insight on the structure.References
[1] Dolarslan, E. S. (2008) ‘A review of post-modern management techniques as currently applied to Turkish forestry’. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(1), pp. 25-35.
[2] Olsen (2008) ‘The ups and downs of bureaucratic organisations’. Annual Review of Political Science,11, pp.13-37.
[3] du Gay, P. (2000) In Praise of Bureaucracy: Weber, Organization and Ethics. London: Sage.
[4] Grey, C. (2017) A very short, fairly interesting and reasonably cheap book about studying organisations. London: Sage.
[5] Weber, M. (1946) From Max Weber: Essays in sociology. Gerth, H. H. and Mills, C. W. Trans. New York: Oxford University Press.
[6] Weber, M. (1978) Economy and society. Edited by Roth, G. and Wittich, C. Berkeley: University of California Press.
[7] Jackson, B. and Parry, K. (2016) A Very Short, Fairly Interesting and Reasonably Cheap Book about Studying Leadership. 3rd ed. London: Sage.
[8] Ritzer, G. (2007) The McDonaldization of Society. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
[9] UPS (2021) About UPS. [Online] Available at: https://www.ups.com/gb/en/about/facts.page? (Accessed: 25 Mar 2021).
[10] Citeman (2021) Bureaucratic Organisations. [Online]. Available at:https://www.citeman.com/11989-bureaucratic-organizations.html (Accessed: 25 Mar 2021).
[11] Glassdoor (2015) Employee review. [Online]. Available at: https://www.glassdoor.com/Reviews/Employee-Review-UPS-VW6926878.htm (Accessed: 25 Mar 2021).
[12] Compton, M. E. and Meier, J. K. (2017) ‘Bureaucracy to Postbureaucracy: The Consequences of Politcal Failures.’ Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management. [Online]. At: http://oxfordre.com/business/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.001.0001/acrefore-9780190224851-e-127# (Accessed: 25 Mar 2021).
[13] Sinden, J. E., Hoy, W. K. and Sweetland, S. R. (2004) ‘An analysis of enabling school structure’ Journal of Educational Administration, 42(4), pp.462-478.
[14] BBC (2016) ‘Useless’ bureaucracy hitting teacher morale – union. [Online]. Available at: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-35935868 (Accessed: 25 Mar 2021).
[15] Hoy, W. K. and Sweetland, S. R. (2001) ‘Designing better schools: The meaning and nature of enabling school structure’. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37, pp. 296-321.
[16] Hoy, W. K. and Miskel, C. G. (2010) Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice. Ankara, Turkey: Nobel.
[17] Adler, P. S., and Borys, B. (1996) ‘Two types of bureaucracy: Enabling and coercive’. Administrative Quarterly, (41), pp. 61-89.
[18] Betoret, F. D. (2009) ‘Self-efficacy, school resources, job stressors and burnout among Spanish primary and secondary school teachers’. A structural equation approach. Educational Psychology, 29(1), pp. 45-68.
[19] Grey, C. (2005) A very short, fairly interesting and reasonably cheap book about studying organizations. London: Sage.
[20] McGuigan, L. (2005) ‘The role of enabling bureaucracy and academic optimism in academic achievement growth’. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3179683)
[21] Hoy, W. K. and Woolfolk, A. E. (1993) ‘Teachers’ sense of efficacy and the organizational health of schools’ Elementary School Journal, 93, pp. 335-372.
[22] Gencturk and Memis (2010) ‘Investigation of primary school teachers’ teacher efficacy and job satisfaction in terms of demographic factors’. Elementary Education Online, 9(3), pp.1037-1054.
[23] Coladarci, T. (1992). Teachers’ sense of efficacy and commitment to teaching. The Journal of Experimental Education, 60(4), pp. 323-337.
[24] Tschannen M. M. and Woolfolk, H., A. (2007) ‘The differential antecedents of self-efficacy beliefs of novice and experienced teachers’ Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(6), pp. 944-956.
[25] Merton, R. (1940) ‘Bureaucratic structure and personality, Social Forces, (May), pp. 560–568.
[26] Gewirtz, S. (2002) The Managerial School. London: Routledge.
[27] Cerit, Y. (2013) ‘The relationship between bureaucratic school structure and classroom teachers’ professional behaviours’. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 18(4), pp. 497-521.
[28] BBC (2015) Volkswa'gen: The Scandal Explained. [Online]. Available at:https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-34324772 (Accessed: 25 Mar 2021).
[29] McGuigan, L. and Hoy, W. K. (2006) ‘Principal leadership: Creating a culture of academic optimism to improve achievement for all students. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 5(3), pp. 203-229.
Authors contributing to this journal agree to publish their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International License, allowing third parties to share their work (copy, distribute, transmit) and to adapt it, under the condition that the authors are given credit, that the work is not used for commercial purposes, and that in the event of reuse or distribution, the terms of this license are made clear. With this license, the authors hold the copyright without restrictions and are allowed to retain publishing rights without restrictions as long as this journal is the original publisher of the articles.
